What this category's data looks like
This category's data typically includes three types of external materials for self-taught examination registration records and graduation review: registration archives, course qualification certificates, and graduation application forms. Registration archives record the candidate's basic information, admission ticket number, major name, and past examination statuses, with dates based on the stamped receipt from the provincial examination office; course qualification certificates list the name, credits, qualification date, and certificate number item by item by course; graduation application forms summarize the completion of the major plan, the conclusion of the practical segment, the ideological and moral appraisal, and the signature fields. The sources of the materials are exports from the provincial examination office's business system, stamped documents from the host institution, and paper receipts submitted by candidates. The update rhythm rolls forward with examination periods and graduation review batches, and the field characteristics are cross-table intersections with scattered signatures and receipts. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, registration archives serve as the draft for identity and major scope, course qualification certificates serve as the checklist for item-by-item verification, and graduation application forms serve as the basis for the final conclusion and signatures.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, the preceding context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration archives | Correspond item by item with the course qualification certificates and graduation application forms in name, admission ticket number, major name, and qualification date, with complete signatures and receipts | Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, and compare the fields and dates of the two materials |
| Course qualification certificates | The course name, credits, qualification date, and certificate number are consistent between the registration archives and the graduation application form, and the versions are synchronized | Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and record how messages and variables are carried over |
| Graduation application form | The conclusion of the major plan completion, the conclusion of the practical segment, the ideological and moral appraisal, and the signature fields are complete; if a signature or receipt is missing, it must not be visible | Before opening it to parents or superiors, check the signatures and receipts, confirm that unauthorized access is not visible, and retain the conversation scope corresponding to chatId |
| Memory turns and prompt configuration | Matches the preceding context range required by the question, consecutive follow-up questions can correctly carry over references, and runtime consumption changes with the number of turns | Run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, compare the usage records of the two runs, and check whether the opening message is treated as preceding context |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the registration archives and the course qualification certificates. Cause: The two material versions are not synchronized, the export batches differ, and the field definitions are not unified.
- Symptom: The graduation application form lacks a signature or receipt, but the external entry point can still view it. Cause: The authorization scope was not tightened according to material status, and the signature fields and receipts were not included in the visibility judgment.
- Symptom: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, and the response becomes slower with increased consumption. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the preceding context range required by the question, and the opening message is treated as preceding context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: use two consecutive follow-up questions to see whether the second question carries over the reference from the first question; check whether the referenced historical message range and answer constraints in messages match, and whether variables and chatId are correctly carried in with the conversation.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, confirm that unauthorized access is not visible, and before opening it to parents or superiors, confirm that signatures and receipts are complete.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, and compare the usage records of the two runs.
- Check the names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts of the registration archives, course qualification certificates, and graduation application forms, and confirm that the versions are synchronized before opening them to parents or superiors.