What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three types of materials: registration forms, care bonus point materials, and admission rosters. Registration forms are filled out by candidates and reviewed by the admissions examination institution, with fields including name, ID number, application level, subject category, date, and signature; care bonus point materials are submitted by candidates and verified by the relevant departments, with fields including bonus item, supporting document name, quantity, issue date, and receipt; admission rosters are reported by admitting institutions and filed by provincial-level institutions, with fields including candidate number, admitted major, admission date, and seal. Materials are updated in batches by registration season, review season, and admission season, with versions rolling with the batches. When the three types of materials enter the authorized access and external service function, the registration form serves as the entry basis for identity and visible scope matching, the care bonus point materials serve as supporting attachments with restricted visibility, and the admission roster serves as the final-state record publicly disclosed externally. Multi-turn dialogue and prompts organize the historical message range and answer constraints accordingly.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The finished product is answered by the model accordingly, while external entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Corresponds item by item with the care bonus point materials and admission roster in name, quantity, date, and signature | Check the memory turns value in the application settings to confirm it can cover the range required by the preceding text; use a restricted identity to retrieve the registration form and bonus materials, and compare whether name, ID number, application level, date, and signature are consistent |
| Care bonus point materials | Corresponds item by item with the registration form and admission roster in bonus item, quantity, issue date, and receipt | Run a trial with two consecutive follow-up questions, using a referential follow-up in the second round about the bonus item, and see whether the answer carries forward the first round; check whether the material version is synchronized with the batch, and whether the receipt and signature are complete |
| Admission roster | Corresponds item by item with the registration form and care bonus point materials in candidate number, admitted major, admission date, and seal | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes with the turn adjustment; check whether the roster version is synchronized with the filing batch, and it is not visible when signature or receipt is missing |
| messages | The historical message range matches the preceding text range required by the question | Check the current memory turns in the application settings to confirm that messages covers the required turns; use chatId to distinguish sessions, and check whether the batch identifier passed in variables is consistent with the material version |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same candidate's name, quantity, and date do not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, or entry was not checked against the batch receipt.
- Symptom: Care bonus point materials lack a signature or receipt but still appear in the externally visible scope. Cause: The authorization scope was not determined by material completeness, and unauthorized visibility was not blocked.
- Symptom: The second question answers off-topic when using a referential expression, or the answer becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns are too small to use the preceding text, or too large and bring in irrelevant content and increase consumption.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the referential expression of the first; check the coverage range of messages and the session isolation of chatId, and confirm that the batch identifier passed in variables is consistent with the material version.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and see whether the visible scope matches the setting; when opening to parents or superiors, confirm that unauthorized materials are not visible.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question sentences, and confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the referential expression of the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that usage changes with the turn adjustment; check the tokens of the referenced text, record the array count separately, and do not compare the two as equal.