What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management materials include registration forms, care bonus point materials, and admission rosters, with fields such as name, ID number, examinee number, bonus point item, admission batch, date, and signature. Registration forms are filled in by examinees, care bonus point materials are attached with certificates and review opinions, and admission rosters record the final admission results. After entering the knowledge base retrieval service, the three serve as sources of candidate chunks for subsequent nodes or manual generation of external entry points and authorization scopes. The update cadence advances with the registration, review, and admission stages. The name, quantity, and date of the same record must be consistent across materials, and versions and signature receipts must be synchronized.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The external entry points and authorization scopes are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Registration form | Fields include name, ID number, examinee number, application level, date, and signature, and must be aligned item by item with the care bonus point materials and admission roster | In the search test, test once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and scores, and check whether the returned chunks cover the key fields of the registration form |
| Care bonus point materials | The bonus point item, certificate number, review opinion, date, and signature must be consistent with the registration form; if the version is not synchronized, they must not be used as an external basis | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare whether the candidates simultaneously contain the bonus point item and review opinion, and check the signature and receipt fields |
| Admission roster | The admission batch, institution, major, examinee number, and date must correspond to the registration form and care bonus point materials, and the quantity and names must not mismatch | Enable and disable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few items, record the number of candidates and scores, and confirm that admission roster chunks are not crowded out by irrelevant content |
| Authorization scope | The visitor identity matches the visible scope, unauthorized content is not visible, and external entry points expose only material fields within authorization | Access once with a restricted identity, check whether the visible chunks fall within the authorization scope, and unauthorized materials should not appear in candidate or cited content |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, examinee number, or date of the same examinee does not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: The versions of the two materials are not synchronized, and retrieval hits chunks from different versions.
- Symptom: Care bonus point materials lack a signature or receipt but still appear in externally cited content. Cause: Similarity filtering did not intercept chunks missing signatures, and the authorization scope does not cover that field.
- Symptom: There are many candidates but the ones ranked at the front are all irrelevant, and the answer lacks key paragraphs. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, re-rank is not enabled, or the citation upper limit is trimmed excessively.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-rank to observe the ranking of the top few items; switch searchMode, record the number of candidates and scores, and when the citation upper limit is involved, check the cited text tokens, record the array item count separately, and observe limit and similarity according to the test values.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity and check whether the visible scope matches the setting.
- In the knowledge base search test, test once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and scores, and switch
searchModeto compare semantic, full-text, and hybrid results. - Enable and disable
usingReRankto compare the ranking of the top few items, and check whether key original text chunks are retained after similarity filtering and citation upper-limit trimming.