What this category's data looks like
Teacher qualification exams and certification involve three core types of materials: written and interview registration forms, Mandarin proficiency certificates, and medical examination forms. The registration form contains name, ID number, subjects applied for, examination district, date, and signature field; the Mandarin proficiency certificate contains grade, certificate number, test date, and issuing institution; the medical examination form contains examination items, conclusion, physician signature, and hospital receipt. The three types of materials come from different sources: the registration form is generated by the examination institution, the Mandarin proficiency certificate is issued by the testing station, and the medical examination form is issued by the designated hospital. Their update rhythms differ: the registration form is updated with each registration batch, the certificate is issued by test batch, and the medical examination form takes effect by examination date. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the registration form serves as the basis for identity verification, while the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form serve as the basis for qualification determination, each playing a different role.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the reference range of historical messages and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions; the model only processes filtered materials, while the publishing service and file permissions are responsible for the final external entry points and authorization.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Written and interview registration form | Whether the fields, dates, and signature are consistent with the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form | Check the name, ID number, subjects applied for, dates, and signature fields in the registration form against the certificate and medical examination form, and confirm that the record name, quantity, and dates match across the three materials |
| Mandarin proficiency certificate | Whether the grade, certificate number, and test date match the registration form and medical examination form | Check whether the certificate number is consistent with the registration form record, check whether the versions are synchronized, and confirm there is no missing signature or receipt |
| Medical examination form | Whether the examination items, conclusion, physician signature, and receipt correspond to the registration form and Mandarin proficiency certificate | Check whether the examination date matches the registration batch, and check whether the physician signature and hospital receipt are complete |
| Memory turns | Whether it matches the preceding context range required by the question | Check the current value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second round correctly carries forward the references from the first round, and inspect the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables in the conversation |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and dates of the same record do not match between the registration form and the Mandarin proficiency certificate. Cause: The two materials are generated by different institutions, versions are not synchronized, and there is no unified verification.
- Symptom: The medical examination form lacks a physician signature or hospital receipt, and the signature field on the registration form is blank. Cause: The material circulation process did not check signatures and receipts item by item, and versions were not synchronized.
- Symptom: When the second question uses references, the answer does not address the question, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: Too few memory turns make it impossible to use the preceding context, while too many bring in irrelevant content and increase consumption.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and check whether the transmission of chatId, messages, and variables in the historical messages conforms to the settings.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible range conforms to the settings, and confirm that unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current value of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the references from the first round.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, check the consumption changes after adjusting the number of turns, and confirm that the opening message is not treated as preceding context.