What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the preliminary review scenario for academic journal submissions, and the materials are of three types: submitted manuscripts, author information forms, and plagiarism check reports. The submitted manuscript carries the title, author order, affiliation, funding, receipt date, and the corresponding author's signature field; the author information form lists all authors' names, ordering, affiliations, contribution statements, and contact details; the plagiarism check report provides the check date, similarity rate range, and the checking institution's receipt. The three are updated synchronously by submission batch, and during the preliminary review stage the receipt date and signature field serve as the version anchors. When entering the multi-turn dialogue and prompt feature, the submitted manuscript provides the body text and the referent of the title, the author information form provides the author name and affiliation fields for consistency verification, and the plagiarism check report provides the check date and receipt number for determining whether the materials are complete. In the app settings, the materials participate as retrievable content in historical message reference, the answer constraints are given by the prompt, and the externally visible scope is determined separately by the publishing service and file permissions.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the app settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. Memory turns control how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use the preceding text, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Submitted manuscript | The title, author order, affiliation, funding, receipt date, and corresponding author's signature field must correspond item by item with the author information form, and the date and signature must not be missing | Check the current memory turns value in the app settings, run a trial with two consecutive turns of questions, and check whether the second turn's reference to the title and author order carries over from the first turn |
| Author information form | All authors' names, ordering, affiliations, contribution statements, and contact details must be consistent with the submitted manuscript, and the names and counts in the same record must not fail to match | Compare the name and ordering of the same author in the two materials, confirm the versions are synchronized, and check whether the contribution statement and contact details have missing items |
| Plagiarism check report | The check date, similarity rate range, and checking institution's receipt must match the submission batch date, and the receipt must not be missing | Check the chronological relationship between the check date and the receipt date, confirm the receipt number exists, and check whether the report version is synchronized with the current manuscript version |
| Multi-turn dialogue record | The second turn can correctly carry over the reference from the first turn, and the historical message range is consistent with the prompt constraints | Run a trial with two consecutive turns of questions, and check whether messages and chatId continue the same session and whether variables bring in the author and manuscript fields |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same author's name, ordering, or affiliation does not match between the submitted manuscript and the author information form. Cause: The two materials' versions are not synchronized, and the change was made on only one side.
- Symptom: The plagiarism check report's check date and the receipt date are misaligned, or the receipt number is missing. Cause: The report was not updated with the manuscript batch, and the signature and receipt steps have missing items.
- Symptom: When a reference is used in the second question, the answer does not address the question, or the answer becomes slower and consumption rises. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the preceding text range, and the opening message is treated as preceding text.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries over the reference from the first question, and check the continuation relationship between messages and chatId.
Business test: access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current memory turns value in the app settings, and confirm it matches the preceding text range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, and confirm that the run consumption changes accordingly after the turns adjustment.