What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the external service scenario for journal publication licenses and annual verification. The materials include three types: journal publication license, annual verification form, and rectification report. The license states the name, publication period, publication number, and validity period; the annual verification form records, by year, the publishing unit, publication period, print run, verification opinion, and signature; the rectification report records the issue items, rectification measures, completion date, and receipt. In terms of update cadence, the license is reissued upon changes, the verification form is filed annually, and the rectification report is submitted per matter. When these three types of materials enter the dialogue and authorization stage, the license and verification form serve as the basis for identity and scope, while the rectification report serves as supplementary explanatory material. The visible scope is determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model answers only based on the prompts and the number of memory turns.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The externally available entry points and authorization scope are determined by the publishing service and file permissions, and the model only processes filtered materials. The number of memory turns controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior context cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | Whether the name, publication number, and validity period are consistent with those stated in the annual verification form | Check the current values in the application settings, and run a trial with two consecutive questions to see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first; compare the name, publication number, and date fields in the license and the verification form |
| Annual verification form | Whether the year, print run, verification opinion, and signature correspond to the license and the rectification report | Run a trial with two consecutive questions to check whether the second round correctly picks up the reference from the first round; verify the year, name, and quantity fields in the verification form and the license, and check whether the signature and receipt are complete |
| Rectification report | Whether the issue items, rectification date, and receipt are synchronized with the records in the verification form | Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns; verify the item names, dates, and quantities in the rectification report and the verification form, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Continuous follow-up questions and run consumption | The second round can correctly pick up the reference from the first round, and usage changes accordingly after adjusting the number of turns | Check the current values in the application settings and run a trial with two consecutive questions; compare the usage records of two runs and check whether the passing of chatId, messages, and variables in the session is consistent |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the license and the verification form. Cause: The two materials are filed separately, without field-level comparison and receipt verification.
- Symptom: The rectification report and the verification form are not synchronized in version, and old items are still referenced. Cause: After the materials were updated, they were not re-associated, and the version number and date were not rechecked.
- Symptom: When the second question uses a reference, the answer does not address the question, responses become slower, and consumption rises. Cause: The value of the number of memory turns does not match the prior context range, or the opening message is treated as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first, and check the current value of the number of memory turns in the application settings.
Business test: Access once with a restricted identity, see whether the visible scope matches the setting, and confirm that unauthorized content is not visible.
- Check the current value of the number of memory turns in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and record the passing of
chatId,messages, andvariables. - Compare the usage records of two runs, and check whether the names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts of the license, annual verification form, and rectification report are consistent.