What this category's data looks like
Materials for multilingual materials and terminology processing in kindergarten play activity organization come from observation records, area plans, material placement lists, activity objectives, and reflection records; the update cadence follows the weekly activity schedule and teaching-research reviews. Observation records and area plans must correspond item by item, material placement quantities must be traceable back to list entries, activity objectives and observation conclusions must be aligned, and reflection entries must be converted into next week's plan. In multilingual scenarios, the same term must keep the same wording across Chinese, English, and other language drafts, and translated names must be traceable back to the corresponding position in the source text. When these materials enter workflow orchestration, they respectively take on the roles of source, comparison baseline, quantity verification, and terminology extraction, ultimately converging into a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When this node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Observation records and area plans | Whether the same activity entry points to the same segment in both materials, and whether objectives and observations are aligned | Compare activity names and segments item by item, and mark entries where objectives and observations do not match |
| Material placement list | Whether placement quantities match the quantities listed in the area plan, and whether material shortages occur | Count item by item according to the list, and record the entries where quantity gaps exist |
| Multilingual terminology entries | Whether the same term has consistent wording across language drafts, and whether translated names can be traced back to the source text | Extract three terms, check their wording throughout the document, and reference variables in a subsequent node to run a trial once |
| Reflections and next week's plan | Whether reflection entries have been converted into next week's plan, and whether the plan has been updated | Compare the reflection list with next week's plan, and mark entries that have not been updated |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same activity has inconsistent terminology wording across multilingual drafts. Cause: terms were not merged first, each language draft extracted separately, and translated names cannot be traced back to the source text.
- Phenomenon: material placement quantities do not match the area plan. Cause: the list was not updated with the plan, and entries with material shortages were not marked.
- Phenomenon: activity objectives do not match observation records. Cause: objectives were written during the planning stage, observations were recorded after the activity, and the two were not compared for alignment and written back.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: run each option as a trial, check the branch directions and interaction states in the run records, and reference variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes to confirm that the selection results have been passed in.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document.
- In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Trigger an interaction once, view the node status and branch directions in the run records, and confirm that the process continues after the interaction is completed.