What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the kindergarten operation behavior and quality self-assessment scenario. The materials include three types: self-assessment reports, issue lists, and rectification plans. The fields cover the items of operation conditions, safety and hygiene, care and education, faculty and staff, and internal management. Dates include the self-assessment date, rectification start and end dates, and review date. Signatures include the principal, the self-assessment team, the responsible inspector, and the receipt. The multilingual materials come from bilingual parallel drafts, foreign-language reference materials, and terminology glossary drafts, and the update cadence rolls forward with the self-assessment cycle and rectification rounds. When entering this function, the self-assessment report serves as the main record carrying items and conclusions, the issue list serves as the discrepancy record carrying item numbers and responsible persons, the rectification plan serves as the time-series record carrying deadlines and signature slots, and the terminology glossary draft serves as the comparison source document for reference when generating the unified glossary and parallel draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. "Unified glossary and parallel draft" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Self-assessment report | Item names, quantities, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item with the issue list and rectification plan | Compare the names, quantities, self-assessment dates, and signature fields in the three materials by item number, and check whether the variables references are consistent |
| Issue list | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the two materials must not mismatch | Extract three issue records and trace back the corresponding wording and dates in the self-assessment report and rectification plan |
| Rectification plan | The version must be synchronized with the self-assessment report, and signatures and receipts must not be missing | Check the rectification start and end dates, responsible person signatures, and receipt attachments, and check the branch records pointed to by nodeId |
| Terminology glossary draft | The same term must be consistent throughout, and the translated name must be traceable back to the source text | Extract three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and check the values of variables in subsequent nodes |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names and quantities of the same record in the self-assessment report and issue list do not match. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, without unified trace-back by item number.
- Symptom: The rectification plan version is not synchronized, and the dates are inconsistent with the self-assessment report. Cause: After the rectification round is updated, branch selection is not re-triggered, and the old version is still referenced.
- Symptom: Signatures or receipts are missing, and the materials cannot be released externally. Cause: Signature slots and receipt attachments are not included in field verification, and the process stops after the interaction is completed.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: try running each option one by one, check the branch directions and interaction state records in the run log, and confirm that the selection result variables have been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and trace back to the source text to verify the translated names.
- In the nodes, check the options and branch connections one by one, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Trigger one user selection and view the node status and selection result variables in the run log.