Knowledge Base Retrieval for School Admissions and Enrollment Organization: Handle Multilingual Materials and Terminology

What this category's data looks like

This page is for primary and secondary school admissions organizations, and the materials come from three types: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admissions plan contains application conditions, time nodes, and admission rules; the application material checklist lists document names, number of copies, and submission dates; the admission list records names, numbers, admission status, and signature fields. The materials are updated on an academic-year cycle, and versions are adjusted with policies and batches. Fields include name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt. When entering knowledge base retrieval and recall, the admissions plan serves as the rule basis, the application material checklist serves as the field comparison draft, and the admission list serves as the record verification sample. Together, the three support the generation of a unified terminology table and comparison draft.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The unified terminology table and comparison draft are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.

Three common errors

• Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the admissions plan and the admission list. Cause: Multi-version materials are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates come from different batches.
• Phenomenon: The application material checklist lacks signatures or receipts, and the signature field in the admission list is blank. Cause: The material circulation step was not backfilled, and versions are not synchronized.
• Phenomenon: The translated name of the same term is written inconsistently in different materials and cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: The terminology table is not unified, and retrieval candidates do not cover the comparison draft.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance for this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank to see the ordering of the top few results; record the number of candidates and scores, and verify the effects of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit.

Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, and verify whether the translated names can be traced back to the original text.

• In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode, check once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and scores, and compare the order of the top few results before and after reranking.
• Verify the names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts of the admissions plan, application material checklist, and admission list, check the tokens of the quoted text after similarity filtering and limit trimming, and record the number of array items separately.