What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of exam question setting and grading in primary and secondary schools. The materials include three types: the question-setting two-way specification table, the exam paper, and the grading rubric. The specification table defines the assessment points and question type distribution, the exam paper carries the question stems and options, and the grading rubric provides the scoring points and deduction explanations. After these three types of materials enter the model integration and configuration stage, each plays a different role: the specification table is used to verify the terminology coverage scope, the exam paper is used to extract terminology instances to be unified, and the grading rubric is used to check the criteria for determining whether translated names refer back to the original text. The material sources are the final drafts and revised drafts submitted by the teaching and research group. The update rhythm adjusts with exam batches and textbook versions. The field characteristics are concentrated in four categories: name, quantity, date, and signature receipt. The same terminology must remain consistent throughout across different materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, which outputs the model binding relationships and channel responses. The "unified terminology table and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five types: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Question-setting two-way specification table | Assessment point names, quantities, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the exam paper | Check the assessment point names, question quantities, and dates in the specification table and the exam paper, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Exam paper | Terminology usage must correspond item by item with the unified terminology table | Extract three terms, compare their usage throughout the document, and check whether the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken are consistent with the channel response |
| Grading rubric | Scoring point names and quantities must match the specification table and the exam paper | Check the scoring point names, quantities, and dates in the grading rubric, and confirm that the version is synchronized with the exam paper |
| Model configuration | Model types correspond to the steps in which they are used | In the model configuration, check the type labels, and compare them with the model names and toolChoice settings returned by the channel |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same assessment point has inconsistent names or quantities in the specification table and the exam paper. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, versions were not synchronized, and there is no unified terminology comparison draft.
- Symptom: The date of the grading rubric is inconsistent with the final draft date of the exam paper. Cause: The revised draft was not backfilled, signatures and receipts are missing, and the material circulation process left no trace.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports indexing model-related errors or authentication failures. Cause: The channel key is inconsistent with the integrated service, and the model type labels do not match the steps.
How to verify the setup
This feature acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm it is consistent with the name listed in the documentation.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the document, and check whether the translated names can refer back to the original text.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the model name returned by the channel.
- Check that the model type labels correspond to the steps to be used, and check whether the indexing model and reranking model are bound correctly.