What this category's data looks like
This page addresses district and county teaching research activities and lesson observation and evaluation scenarios; materials include teaching research activity notices, lesson observation records, and lesson evaluation minutes. Notices come from teaching research departments and are updated by activity batch; fields include activity name, date, location, participating schools, and signature or receipt. Lesson observation records are filled in by observers by period; fields include instructor, class, topic, observation points, and time. Lesson evaluation minutes are compiled by subject groups; fields include review points, improvement suggestions, and signature. When these three types of materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, notices serve as activity background and terminology source, lesson observation records serve as process evidence, and lesson evaluation minutes serve as the basis for conclusions and terminology comparison. Multilingual materials and terminology handling require a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft, consistent wording of the same term throughout, and translated names that can refer back to the source text, with final delivery for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; too small a value fails to use prior context, while too large a value brings in irrelevant content and increases consumption.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching research activity notice | The same activity name, date, and participating schools are consistent across the notice, lesson observation records, and lesson evaluation minutes, and signatures or receipts are complete | Check the memory turns value in application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second round can carry forward the references from the first round |
| Lesson observation record | The same instructor, class, topic, and period match in name, quantity, and date between the records and the minutes, and versions are synchronized | Compare the usage records of two runs, check the usage changes after adjusting the turns, and verify whether the historical message range covers the required prior context |
| Lesson evaluation minutes | Terminology wording in the review points and improvement suggestions is consistent throughout, translated names can refer back to the source text, and missing signatures or receipts must be completed | Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and verify the correspondence of messages, chatId, and variables in the session |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term is consistent throughout, translated names can refer back to the source text, and terminology comparison is completed before external release | Run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second round gives irrelevant answers when using references, and verify whether the opening message is treated as prior context |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the notice and the lesson observation record. Cause: The two materials are updated separately, no terminology and field comparison has been done, and versions are not synchronized.
- Symptom: The lesson evaluation minutes lack signatures or receipts, and the source text cannot be referenced during external release. Cause: The signature was not checked during material circulation, and the terminology glossary and comparison draft were not synchronized to the release version.
- Symptom: The second question gives irrelevant answers when using references, and responses become slower with increased consumption. Cause: The memory turns value does not match the prior context range, bringing in irrelevant content or treating the opening message as prior context.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the references from the first question, and verify whether the referenced historical message range and answer constraints match.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout, and verify whether translated names can refer back to the source text.
- Check the current memory turns value in application settings, and confirm it matches the prior context range required by the question.
- Compare the usage records of two runs, and check the changes in run consumption after adjusting the turns.