What this category's data looks like
District and county teaching research activities and lesson observation and evaluation involve three types of materials: teaching research activity notices, lesson observation records, and lesson evaluation minutes. Notices contain the activity name, date, subject, location, participants, and receipt requirements; lesson observation records contain the instructor, class, topic, observation points, and signature field; lesson evaluation minutes contain evaluation opinions, improvement suggestions, host, and signature. Materials are mostly submitted by each school, with an update rhythm of release before the activity, recording during the activity, and consolidation after the activity. During multilingual materials and terminology processing, the subject terminology in notices, classroom language in records, and evaluation expressions in minutes need to be unified. When the three types of materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, notices serve as the retrieval entry point, records serve as the fragment source, and minutes serve as the reference basis, jointly supporting the generation of the terminology list and the comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming). "Unified terminology list and comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching research activity notice | Check whether the activity name, date, subject, participants, and receipt requirements are consistent with the lesson observation records and lesson evaluation minutes | In the search test, switch searchMode, compare semantic, full-text, and hybrid recall candidates, and record the number of candidates and scores |
| Lesson observation record | Check whether the instructor, class, topic, observation points, and signature field correspond to the notice and minutes | Enable or disable usingReRank, compare the ranking changes of the top few items, and check whether key fragments are retained |
| Lesson evaluation minutes | Check whether the evaluation opinions, improvement suggestions, host, and signature correspond to the notice and records | Adjust similarity and limit, observe changes in the number of candidates and scores, and confirm that the cited text tokens are recorded separately |
| Unified terminology list and comparison draft | The same term is written consistently throughout the entire text, and the translated name can refer back to the original text | Sample three terms to check whether the writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and verify the correspondence of terms in the notice, records, and minutes |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name and date of the same record do not match between the notice and the minutes. Cause: Material versions are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates come from different batches.
- Phenomenon: The lesson observation record lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The submission step is not closed-loop, and the retrieval results cannot confirm material completeness.
- Phenomenon: The same term is written inconsistently in different materials. Cause: Multilingual materials do not have a unified terminology list, and recalled fragments are independent of each other.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to check the ranking of the top few items.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether the writing is consistent throughout the entire text.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, record the number of candidates and scores, and confirm whether semantic and full-text results appear at the same time. - Adjust
similarityandlimit, compare cited text tokens and array item counts, record them separately, and do not perform equality comparison.