What this category's data looks like
In the scenarios of school moral education and homeroom teacher work, themed class meeting plans, student comprehensive quality records, and home visit records are the three core types of materials, with fields covering activity theme, number of participants, record date, teacher signature, parent receipt, etc. Material sources include grade group submission, homeroom teacher filing, and moral education department aggregation, with an update rhythm of three concentrated revision rounds at the beginning, middle, and end of each semester. During multilingual materials and terminology processing, the themed class meeting plan serves as the reference baseline for activity names and process terminology, the student comprehensive quality record serves as the translation-name back-reference for evaluation dimensions and grade expressions, and the home visit record serves as the version check for communication items and date signatures. After the three types of materials enter workflow orchestration, each participates in terminology unification as an independent branch, ensuring that the same terminology is written consistently throughout the entire text and that translation names can back-reference the original text, and is finally submitted for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. "Unified terminology table and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branches. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Themed class meeting plan | The activity name and process terminology are written consistently in the plan and the summary table, and dates and signatures are complete | Check the theme name, activity date, and homeroom teacher signature in the plan and the grade group summary table, and confirm that the same terminology back-references the original text throughout the entire text |
| Student comprehensive quality record | The names, quantities, and dates of evaluation dimensions and grade expressions match in the two materials | Compare the dimension names, number of entries, and record dates in the student record and the moral education department summary table, and check whether the versions are synchronized |
| Home visit record | Communication items and receipt information are consistent in the class register and the moral education department ledger, with no missing signatures or receipts | Check item by item the home visit target, home visit date, parent signature or receipt, and confirm that the same record's name and date match in the two materials |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, trigger it once to view the node status in the run record, and reference variables and nodeId in a subsequent node to do a trial run once |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match in the class register and the moral education department ledger. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, without cross-checking terminology and fields.
- Phenomenon: After the themed class meeting plan was updated, the grade group summary table still used the old terminology and dates. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, lacking a unified terminology table as a reference baseline.
- Phenomenon: The home visit record lacks a parent signature or receipt but still enters the external release step. Cause: The signature and receipt fields were not included in the pre-release checklist.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Try running each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that the options and branch connections are consistent, that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and reference variables and nodeId in a subsequent node to do a trial run once.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm that the translation names can back-reference the original text.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the user selection node, and trigger it once to view the node status in the run record
- Reference
variablesandnodeIdin a subsequent node to do a trial run once, and confirm that the selection result variable has been passed in