What this category's data looks like
This page is aimed at school moral education and homeroom teacher work scenarios, focusing on three types of materials: thematic class meeting plans, student comprehensive quality records, and home visit records, as well as the unified terminology list and comparison draft in multilingual materials and terminology processing. Material sources include daily school records, home-school communication receipts, and external release drafts, and the update rhythm changes with semester milestones and activity batches. Field characteristics center on record names, quantities, dates, and signature fields, and multilingual versions need to keep translated names traceable back to the source text. When entering the model access and configuration function, thematic class meeting plans undertake terminology extraction and comparison draft generation, student comprehensive quality records provide samples for field consistency verification, home visit records are used to check dates and signature receipts, and the unified terminology list and comparison draft serve as the final output before external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The "unified terminology list and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different steps bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Model type | Corresponds to the step to be used; language models are used for dialogue, indexing models for retrieval, and reranking models for result reranking | Check the type label in the model configuration and compare it with the model name returned by the channel |
| Thematic class meeting plan | If the name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across two materials, the fields and signature fields need to be checked | Sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the whole text, and verify the date and signature receipt |
| Student comprehensive quality record | When versions are not synchronized, differences in field names and quantities are likely to appear, so record names and dates need to be checked | Compare field by field against the unified terminology list, record the number of array entries, and separately check the tokens of the referenced text |
| Home visit record | If signatures or receipts are missing, the material is incomplete, so the signature field and receipt date need to be checked | Verify whether the receipt and signature are complete, and confirm that the translated name can refer back to the source text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match across two materials. Cause: The multilingual versions were updated separately, and the fields were not synchronized based on the unified terminology list.
- Phenomenon: Versions not being synchronized causes the external release draft to be inconsistent with school records. Cause: After the comparison draft was generated, the original materials were not checked back, and the date and signature fields were not verified item by item.
- Phenomenon: Retrieval reports indexing model-related errors or authentication failure. Cause: The channel and key are inconsistent with the accessed service, or the model identifier does not match the name listed in the documentation.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and confirm that maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken in the configuration are consistent with the channel response.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the whole text, and verify whether the translated names can refer back to the source text.
- In the model configuration, check the type label and the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that
toolChoiceis available and the binding relationship is correct. - Compare the thematic class meeting plan, student comprehensive quality record, and home visit record field by field against the unified terminology list, record the number of array entries, and separately check the tokens of the referenced text.