What this category's data looks like
Materials in the course selection, scheduling, and classroom resource allocation category come from three types of documents: course offering plans, scheduling tables, and course selection rules, including multilingual parallel versions and glossaries, with updates advancing along with semester batches and departmental receipts. Course offering plans provide fields for course name, credits, instructor, and offering cycle; scheduling tables provide fields for classroom number, time slot, capacity, and week number; course selection rules provide fields for priority, selection restrictions, and effective date. When these three types of materials enter this feature, course offering plans and course selection rules serve as terminology sources and constraint bases, scheduling tables serve as the working draft for date and quantity verification, and multilingual materials and glossaries serve as the reference baseline for translated names referring back to the source text. Field characteristics center on course codes, classroom numbers, date ranges, signatures, and receipt columns; the same record may have inconsistent names, quantities, or dates across different materials, and unsynchronized versions or missing signatures and receipts will directly affect the consistency of externally published drafts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The "unified glossary and parallel draft" is then completed by the model. The turn count value should match the range of prior context required by the question; if too small, the prior context cannot be used, and if too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Memory turn count | Matches the range of prior context required by the question and can cover the reference span of continuous follow-up questions | Check the current value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and compare the usage records |
| Course offering plan | Course name, credits, instructor, offering cycle align field by field with course selection rules and scheduling tables | Sample three terms and check their usage throughout the document, and verify whether course codes, dates, and signatures and receipts are consistent |
| Scheduling table | Classroom number, time slot, capacity, and week number are consistent with the course offering plan records in quantity and date | Check names, quantities, and dates item by item against the two materials, and inspect version synchronization and receipts |
| Course selection rules | Priority, selection restrictions, and effective date are unified with the standards of course offering plans and scheduling tables | Sample three terms and refer back to the source text, and verify whether effective dates and signature columns are complete |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same course has mismatched names, quantities, or dates in two materials. Cause: the versions of the course offering plan and scheduling table are not synchronized, and field standards are not unified.
- Phenomenon: glossary translated names are inconsistent with the wording in the parallel draft. Cause: multilingual materials were not referred back to the source text after updating, and the glossary was not synchronized with the batch.
- Phenomenon: externally published drafts lack signatures or receipts. Cause: signatures were not collected in the circulation steps of course selection rules and scheduling tables, and the receipt column was left blank.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: with two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; combine chatId, messages, and variables to check the referenced historical message range and answer constraints.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their usage throughout the document is consistent, confirm that translated names can refer back to the source text, and verify the fields, dates, and signatures of course offering plans, scheduling tables, and course selection rules.
- Check the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and compare the usage records of the two runs
- Sample three terms and check their usage throughout the document, and verify the names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts of course offering plans, scheduling tables, and course selection rules