What this category's data looks like
In the graduate admissions re-examination and admission scenario, materials cover re-examination plans, candidate score sheets, and transfer lists, and involve multilingual materials and terminology handling. The re-examination plan gives the process, dates, and signature fields; the candidate score sheet carries scores, rankings, and review traces; the transfer list records transfer destinations, quotas, and receipts. Multilingual materials and terminology handling require the same term to be consistent throughout the whole text and the translated name to be able to refer back to the source text, so when the three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, each plays a different role: the re-examination plan provides process and rule fragments, the score sheet provides field and numerical fragments, and the transfer list provides list and status fragments, jointly supporting the candidate sources for the unified terminology table and the comparison draft. The update rhythm advances with re-examination batches, transfer rounds, and version revisions, and the field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The unified terminology table and comparison draft are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Re-examination plan | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete, and term translations correspond to the source text | In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, check the number of candidates and scores, and check whether the process names, dates, and signature fields in the plan can refer back to the source text |
| Candidate score sheet | The name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the three materials | Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, and check the ranking of the top few entries before and after enabling usingReRank, confirming that the score sheet fields match the transfer list and re-examination plan |
| Transfer list | The version is synchronized and no signatures or receipts are missing | Check the names, quantities, and dates of the transfer list against the re-examination plan and score sheet, record the number of returned candidates and scores, separately record the number of items in the citation array, and check the citation text tokens against the limit and similarity settings |
| Unified terminology table and comparison draft | The same term is consistent throughout the whole text, and the translated name can refer back to the source text | Sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the whole text, check whether the candidate fragments cover multilingual materials and terminology handling, and confirm that the cited content is not a statistical table or authorization result |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same candidate name is written differently in the score sheet and the transfer list. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, the two materials were imported at different times, and terminology was not unified.
- Phenomenon: The date in the re-examination plan does not match the date in the transfer list. Cause: The material update rhythm is inconsistent, and the old version is still recalled among the candidates.
- Phenomenon: The transfer list is missing signatures or receipts. Cause: The materials entered retrieval before being completed, and the candidate fragments cover only part of the fields.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to see the ranking of the top few entries; switch searchMode and adjust similarity and limit, and record the number of candidates and scores.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the whole text, check that the translated names can refer back to the source text, and confirm that the number of items in the citation array and the citation text tokens are recorded separately.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand compare the number of candidates and scores across the semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes. - Compare the ranking of the top few entries before and after enabling
usingReRank, and checksimilarity,limit, and the citation text tokens.