What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management involves materials such as training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. During multilingual materials and terminology processing, the same record often circulates in different languages and different versions. The training plan defines courses and credits, the proposal report records the topic selection and argumentation, and the mid-term assessment form checks progress and comments; the three corroborate each other in fields, dates, and signatures. When the materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each is associated as an independent source, and after a retrieval hit, they are returned as original text fragments with source identifiers for subsequent comparison of terminology wording, translated-name back-reference, and field consistency. The update rhythm advances according to the training stage; unsynchronized versions, mismatched names and dates, and missing signatures or receipts are common inconsistencies.
Configuration and implementation checks
The citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node outputs only an array of cited content, each entry containing an original text fragment and a source identifier, and the length can be 0. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft must be handled subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Even if no content is found, the output chain still runs through.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Whether course names, credit counts, start and end dates, and signature fields are consistent across multilingual versions | Open the citation superscript to compare against the source document, check fields and dates item by item, and record the number of array entries |
| Proposal report | Whether the topic name, argumentation points, date, and supervisor signature can be traced back to the original paragraph | Use quoteList to view the cited fragment and compare whether the same term is written consistently throughout the text |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether the assessment conclusion, quantity, date, and receipt signature match the other two materials | Check the citation source identifiers in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) to confirm version synchronization and signature completeness |
| Knowledge base retrieval node | The selected knowledge base uses the same vector model, and the length of the cited content array matches the hit materials | Try running a query with no match and see whether the array is empty while the chain continues, and check the quoteMaxToken budget |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training plan and the mid-term assessment form. Cause: Multilingual versions were uploaded separately, without terminology unification and field comparison.
- Symptom: The translated term cited in the proposal report is inconsistent with the unified terminology glossary. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and the old draft is still retained in the knowledge base and hit by retrieval.
- Symptom: The mid-term assessment form lacks a signature or receipt, and the cited fragment cannot be traced back to the complete original text. Cause: A page was missed in the scanned copy, and the source identifier points to an incomplete paragraph.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: ask a terminology question with original-text support, and check whether the citation array and citation superscript can be traced back to the original paragraph; then ask a question with no matching material, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout the text, and confirm that translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- Open the search parameter panel and check the values item by item, confirm they are consistent with the settings in the knowledge base retrieval section, and separately record the number of citations and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget. - Open the citation superscript in the conversation, compare
quoteListandresponseDataagainst the source document, and check whether the cited fragments correspond to the original text.