What this category's data looks like
In the degree conferral and certificate information reporting scenario, the materials entering this feature include three types: degree application forms, thesis review forms, and defense resolutions. The degree application form carries the applicant's identity, discipline, and degree level fields; the thesis review form carries review comments, review conclusions, and review dates; the defense resolution carries the defense conclusion, voting results, and signature receipt. The three types of materials often run in parallel in multilingual versions, sourced from departmental aggregation and archival returns, with update cadence following batch reporting and correction receipts. When materials enter this feature, the degree application form and thesis review form are used to extract terminology and field mappings, while the defense resolution is used to verify the completeness of conclusion wording and signatures. Multilingual materials and terminology processing require the same term to be consistent throughout the entire text, translated names to be traceable back to the original text, and fields, dates, and signatures to be aligned across the three materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different steps bind different model types. The configuration only determines binding relationships and call responses, not material permissions.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Degree application form | Fields, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item with the thesis review form and defense resolution | Compare the names, quantities, and dates across the three materials; check whether the values of maxContext and maxTokens match the material volume |
| Thesis review form | The review conclusion and review date must be consistent with the defense resolution; missing signatures or receipts mean it is incomplete | Extract three terms and check their wording throughout the entire text; check quoteMaxToken as the quoted content budget, with the tokens of quoted text calculated separately |
| Defense resolution | The version must be the latest synchronized version, with complete voting results and receipts | Check the channel configuration and key source; compare whether the model name returned by the channel matches the name listed in the documentation |
| Model type | Corresponds to the step to be used; check the type label in the model configuration | Check the step bindings item by item across the five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition; for the retrieval step, check the value of toolChoice |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the degree application form and the thesis review form. Cause: Multilingual versions are not synchronized, and each material extracts terms independently during extraction.
- Symptom: The defense resolution lacks signatures or receipts, and the reporting batch is returned. Cause: When materials enter this feature, only fields were checked, not the completeness of signatures and receipts.
- Symptom: Retrieval reports indexing model-related errors, or authentication fails. Cause: The channel and key are inconsistent with the connected service, or the model type bound to the step does not match.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, and compare whether the model name returned by the channel matches the name listed in the documentation; also check the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken.
Business testing: Extract three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm that translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm they are consistent with the connected service, then check the model identifier against the name listed in the documentation.
- Check the step bindings item by item across the five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and confirm that the retrieval step is bound to the indexing model.