What this category's data looks like
For university employment contract signing and graduation destination statistics, materials include employment agreements, graduation destination registration forms, and employer certificates. Fields cover employer name, unified social credit code, position, signing date, reporting date, signature, and receipt. Sources are departmental summaries and school-level reviews. Updates proceed in batches, and versions are prone to sequential differences. When materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, each plays a different role: employment agreements provide the signing entity and date basis, graduation destination registration forms provide destination category and registration status, and employer certificates provide acceptance opinions and stamped receipts. Multilingual materials and terminology processing require the same term to be consistent throughout and translated names to refer back to the original text. Retrieval must first recall corresponding fragments from the three types of materials, then subsequent nodes or manual work generate a unified terminology table and comparison draft for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate fragments and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The unified terminology table and comparison draft are completed by subsequent nodes or manual work. The retrieval mode switches between semantic, full-text, or hybrid, matching the material form.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Employment agreement | Fields, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the registration form | In the search test, search by employer name and signing date, verify the name, quantity, date, and signature in candidate fragments, record the number of candidates and scores, and switch searchMode for comparison |
| Graduation destination registration form | Destination category and registration status must match the agreement | Search by destination category and registration status, verify whether the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials are consistent, check whether versions are synchronized, and adjust similarity and limit to observe candidate changes |
| Employer certificate | Acceptance opinion, stamp, and receipt must be complete | Search by employer name and acceptance opinion, verify whether the stamp and receipt are missing, enable usingReRank to compare the ranking of the top few items, and confirm that the tokens and array count of the cited text are recorded separately |
| Unified terminology table and comparison draft | The same term must be consistent throughout, and translated names must refer back to the original text | Sample three terms to check whether their usage is consistent throughout, verify whether translated names can refer back to the original text, and confirm that candidate fragments and cited content are not statistical tables or authorization results |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The employer name, quantity, and date of the same record in the employment agreement and graduation destination registration form do not match. Cause: The two materials are entered separately without cross-checking, and versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: The employer certificate lacks a signature or receipt, yet retrieval candidates are still cited. Cause: Material completeness was not verified before entering retrieval, and similarity filtering only trims by text relevance.
- Phenomenon: The same question phrased differently cannot recall the corresponding terminology fragment. Cause: Question optimization does not cover multilingual references, the retrieval mode does not match the material form, and merge and rerank are not effective.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank to see the ranking of the top few items; also switch searchMode, adjust similarity and limit, record the number of candidates and scores, and confirm that the tokens and array count of the cited text are recorded separately.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their usage is consistent throughout, verify whether translated names can refer back to the original text, and confirm that the name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials match, with signatures and receipts complete.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch retrieval modes, compare candidate fragments and similarity scores, and confirm that after multi-path merging both semantic and full-text results are included.
- Compare the order of the top few items before and after enabling rerank, and check whether key fragments of the original text are still retained after similarity filtering and citation limit trimming.