What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials usually include a program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and a faculty and equipment list, with fields covering program name, program code, program length, enrollment target, number of faculty, equipment units/sets, justification date, and signature fields. The materials mostly come from academic affairs offices, secondary colleges, and industry research, and are updated by academic year or application batch, with frequent version changes. When entering the multilingual materials and terminology processing workflow, the filing form serves as the baseline for program names and codes, the talent demand justification provides context for industry terminology and job titles, and the faculty and equipment list supplements quantity, unit, and date fields. The fields of the three materials reference one another, and the name, quantity, and date of the same record need to be aligned across materials; terminology translations must be able to point back to the source text, ultimately forming a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft for external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous turns of dialogue can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | The translations of the program name, program code, program length, and signature fields are consistent in the comparison draft | Check the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, check whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and record messages and chatId |
| Talent demand justification | The translations of job titles and industry terminology can point back to the source text, and the justification date is consistent with the filing form | Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document, compare the justification date with the filing form date, and check whether variables bring in the preceding text range |
| Faculty and equipment list | The number of faculty, equipment units/sets, and units match in quantity across the two materials | Check the quantities in the list against the quantities in the filing form, confirm that signatures or receipts are complete, and compare the usage records of two runs |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same program name is written differently in the filing form and the justification materials. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and the terminology glossary has not been updated with the materials.
- Phenomenon: The number of faculty and equipment units/sets do not match across the two materials. Cause: The quantity and unit fields were not checked across materials.
- Phenomenon: The filing form lacks signatures or receipts. Cause: The signature and seal collection was not completed during material circulation, and no completeness check was done before release.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions, see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question, and check the memory turn count value in the application settings.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings and match it with the preceding text range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, confirm that the second round correctly carries forward the reference from the first round, and compare the usage records of two runs.