What this category's data looks like
Vocational college program setup filing materials include three types: the program setup filing form, talent demand justification, and faculty and equipment list. The filing form provides the program name, code, program length, and date; the justification materials explain talent demand and job correspondence; the faculty and equipment list sets out the number of teachers, the number of equipment units, and signatures. The material sources are college submissions and competent department receipts, and the update cadence advances with application batches and correction notices. Field characteristics are concentrated in names, quantities, dates, and signatures, and the same record often appears across three materials. When the materials enter this feature, the filing form and the list serve as data rows to be parsed, while the justification materials serve as a comparison source; after parsing and chunking, each is bound to a unique data identifier, providing a verifiable draft for subsequent retrieval and terminology unification.
Configuration and implementation checks
Parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks) only output data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed); the unified terminology table and comparison draft must be handled next by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is complete, parsed chunks are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier; the index transitions through three states, and data pending indexing does not participate in recall.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Program setup filing form | Fields include program name, code, program length, and date; signatures and receipts must correspond to the list | Open the data row to check the status, check the file record and the data row separately, and confirm that the chunks split by chunkSize and chunkSplitter retain the name and date |
| Talent demand justification | The same program name and job quantity must be consistent with the filing form, and the version must be synchronized | Compare the name, quantity, and date of the justification and the filing form, view the training mode corresponding to trainingType, and confirm that the index status is indexed |
| Faculty and equipment list | The number of teachers, the number of equipment units, and signatures must match the records in the filing form | Sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document, and see whether the data rows covered by the rebuild task contain only data whose indexing has been completed |
| Data row | Is in one of parsed, indexing, or indexed and is consistent with the interface display | Open the data row to check the status, confirm that data pending indexing does not participate in recall, and that changing the model rebuilds only data whose indexing has been completed |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the filing form and the list. Cause: The two materials were parsed and chunked separately, and the fields were not aligned under the same terminology table.
- Symptom: After the justification materials are updated, the filing form still uses the old version, and two versions appear in the retrieval results. Cause: The versions were not synchronized, and data pending indexing and data whose indexing has been completed are mixed in the same directory.
- Symptom: The list lacks a signature or receipt, and the published draft cannot be traced back to the original text. Cause: Parsing and persistence retained only the body text, and the signature page was not bound to the same data identifier as a data row.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Upload one material, observe the status transitions of the data rows and the coverage scope of the rebuild task, and confirm that the statuses are parsed, indexing, and indexed in order, and that the rebuild covers only data whose indexing has been completed.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document, confirm that translated names can be traced back to the original text, and record the tokens of the quoted text and the number of array entries separately.
- Open the data row to check the status, check the file record and the data row separately, and confirm that the unique data identifier is bound correctly.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that changing the model triggers a rebuild only for data whose indexing has been completed.