What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers the formulation of talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges and involves three types of materials: talent cultivation programs, course standards, and job competency analysis tables. Fields include program name, course code, class hours and credits, job title, competency items, formulation date, reviewer signature, version number, and receipt number. The material sources are academic affairs offices, secondary schools/departments, and industry-enterprise research. The update cadence advances in batches along with adjustments to the program catalog, revisions to course standards, and updates to job competencies, and multilingual materials and terminology processing must be cross-referenced in sync. When entering workflow orchestration, the talent cultivation program serves as the master record, the course standard serves as the course-level reference, and the job competency analysis table serves as the source of competency mapping. Together, the three form the input for terminology extraction and the generation of the comparison draft, and the user selection node controls the branch direction.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the workflow node (user selection and branching), which outputs the branch direction and the interaction state record. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When the node is triggered, the conversation enters the interaction state and the workflow state is recorded. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete; the program name, number of class hours, and formulation date of the same record are consistent in the course standard | Verify the program name, course code, class hours and credits, formulation date, reviewer signature, and version number, and refer back to the corresponding entry in the course standard |
| Course standard | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete; the course name, number of competency items, and revision date of the same record are consistent in the job competency analysis table | Verify the course name, competency items, class hour allocation, revision date, and receipt number, and reference variables to record the comparison result |
| Job competency analysis table | Fields, dates, and signatures are complete; the job title, number of competencies, and research date of the same record are consistent in the talent cultivation program | Verify the job title, competency items, research date, enterprise signature, and receipt, and reference nodeId in a subsequent node to trial-run the branch |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, the interaction state is recorded, and the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | Verify the options and branch connections one by one, and trigger once to view the node state in the run record |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same program name is written differently in the talent cultivation program and the course standard, and the quantities and dates do not match. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, terminology is not unified, and versions are not synchronized.
- Phenomenon: After the course standard is revised, the job competency analysis table still references the old course name and old competency items. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, the receipt number is missing, and the update cadence is inconsistent.
- Phenomenon: The talent cultivation program lacks a reviewer signature or enterprise receipt, making it untraceable when released externally. Cause: The signature and receipt steps are not included in branch verification, and the process stops after the interaction is completed.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: trial-run each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and trial-run once each by referencing variables and nodeId in subsequent nodes.
Business testing: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire document. The same term should be consistent throughout the entire document, and the translated name should be traceable back to the source text. Then verify the names, quantities, dates, and signature receipts.
- In the node, verify the options and branch connections one by one, trigger once to view the node state in the run record, and confirm that after selecting a certain option it no longer follows the default branch.
- In a subsequent node, reference the selection result variable and trial-run once to confirm that after the interaction is completed the process continues executing downward and the same session does not re-enter the interaction.