What this category's data looks like
The development of talent cultivation programs in vocational colleges involves three types of materials: talent cultivation programs, curriculum standards, and job competency analysis tables. The sources are the academic affairs office, secondary colleges, and professional teaching and research offices, revised by academic year and updated with version iterations. Fields include program name, course name, credit hours and credits, job title, competency items, date, and signature. In the multilingual materials and terminology processing scenario, the talent cultivation program serves as the primary terminology source, the curriculum standards provide course definitions, and the job competency analysis tables supplement job and competency expressions. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, they each take on the roles of terminology provenance, contextual supplementation, and cross-verification, for subsequent nodes or manual comparison of translated names and written forms.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, rerank, filter, and limit trimming). The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Talent cultivation program | Program name, course name, credit hours and credits, date, and signature are consistent across the three types of materials | In the search test, search once for each different wording of the same term, record the number of candidate items and scores, and check the field wording |
| Curriculum standards | Course name and credit hours and credits match the talent cultivation program, and the version number is in sync | Switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, and hybrid, and compare whether the candidates contain both types of recall results at the same time |
| Job competency analysis table | Job title, competency items, date, and signature are complete, and no receipt is missing | Compare the order of the top few items before and after enabling usingReRank, and look at the key original text snippets retained under similarity and limit |
| Terminology comparison draft | The same term is consistent throughout the whole text, and the translated name can refer back to the original text | Sample three terms and check their written forms throughout the whole text, verify the number of cited items and the cited text tokens, and do not compare the two as equal |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name or quantity of the same term does not match between two materials. Cause: the primary terminology source is not unified, and the retrieved hit snippets come from different versions, so hits and associations must be checked first.
- Symptom: the dates and signatures of the curriculum standards and the talent cultivation program are inconsistent. Cause: the versions are not in sync, and the old draft still participates in recall in the knowledge base, so filtering by version is required.
- Symptom: the job competency analysis table is missing a signature or receipt. Cause: the material circulation is not closed-loop, and retrieval can only return candidate snippets and cannot replace signature confirmation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle rerank on and off to check the ordering of the top few items, and verify the settings corresponding to the three identifiers searchMode, similarity, and limit.
Business testing: sample three terms and check whether their written forms are consistent throughout the whole text, verify whether the translated names can refer back to the original text, and record the number of candidate items and scores.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch retrieval modes and compare the number of candidate items and scores under different wordings of the same term
- Compare the order of the top few items before and after enabling rerank, and verify the key original text snippets retained under similarity filtering and the citation limit