What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the vocational school student internship management scenario. Materials come from three types: internship agreements, internship plans, and internship logs, with updates advancing by batch and version. Internship agreements contain signatures of the organization and the guardian, start and end dates, and position names; internship plans contain week numbers, task volumes, and supervising instructors; internship logs contain daily records, work hours, and mentor signatures. After entering the model access and configuration stage, the three types of materials each take on different roles: agreements and plans serve as terminology sources and reference drafts, while logs serve as samples for terminology implementation and back-reference verification. Field characteristics manifest as four types: names, quantities, dates, and signatures. Across materials, the same record name is often written differently, quantities and dates do not match, versions are not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Multilingual materials and terminology processing require a unified terminology glossary and reference draft, with the same term consistent throughout the entire text and the translated name able to back-reference the original text. The finished product is delivered for external publication. During testing, three terms are sampled to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology glossary and reference draft are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types. The binding relationships and response results together determine which type of model can be used for subsequent dialogue and retrieval.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Internship agreement | Fields, dates, and signatures: the start and end dates and position names must be consistent with the internship plan; the signature section includes the organization and the guardian; the receipt must not be missing | Check the dates and position name writing of records with the same name in the agreement and plan; check the signature and receipt pages; in the model configuration, check the language model identifier and the model name returned by the channel |
| Internship plan | Fields, dates, and signatures: week numbers, task volumes, and supervising instructors must be back-referenceable from the logs; the version number must be synchronized with the agreement | Compare the week numbers and task volumes of the plan and logs; check whether the version numbers are synchronized; check the indexing model type annotation and the channel configuration and key source |
| Internship log | Fields, dates, and signatures: daily records, work hours, and mentor signatures must correspond to the plan's week numbers; name writing must be consistent with the terminology glossary | Extract three terms to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text; check that log dates correspond to plan week numbers; check the reranking model identifier and the name returned by the channel |
| Model configuration | Model types correspond to stages; model identifiers are consistent with the names listed in the documentation | In the model configuration, check the type annotations; compare with the model names returned by the channel; when reference budget is involved, check quoteMaxToken, record the array count separately, check maxContext and maxTokens by stage, and check toolChoice in tool-calling scenarios |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same internship record do not match between the agreement and the plan. Cause: The two materials are maintained separately, the terminology glossary is not unified, and field alignment is not performed before entering the model.
- Symptom: The internship plan has been updated, but the log is still filled in according to the old week numbers, and the version is not synchronized. Cause: The version number does not flow with the materials, and dialogue and retrieval read old-version content.
- Symptom: The internship agreement lacks the organization's signature or receipt, and the log lacks the mentor's signature. Cause: The signature step is not included in material verification; correct model configuration does not mean that business data permissions and processes are properly configured.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifiers in the responses, confirm that the binding relationships of the language model and indexing model are consistent with the channel responses, and when reference budget is involved, check quoteMaxToken, recording the array count separately.
Business testing: sample three terms to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm that the translated names can back-reference the original text.
- In the model configuration, check that the model type annotations correspond to the stages to be used, and check the model identifiers against the model names returned by the channel.
- Check the channel configuration and key source to confirm that calls can succeed; then check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the internship agreement, internship plan, and internship log are consistent.