What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers three types of materials: student registration forms, teaching plans, and skills training records. Sources include exports from academic affairs systems, submissions from training workshops, and school-enterprise cooperation receipts, with update cadence rolling along with semester registration, monthly training, and plan revisions. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, student registration forms serve as the terminology anchor for student identity and registration status, teaching plans provide course names and class-hour definitions, and skills training records contribute workstation, equipment, and assessment terminology. Field characteristics center on names, major names, course codes, training items, quantities, dates, and signature fields. The same record between registration forms and training records is prone to mismatches in names, quantities, and dates; unsynchronized versions or missing receipts also mean the terminology glossary and the comparison draft require repeated verification before external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). "Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Student registration form | The same student's name, major name, and registration date in the registration form and training records must be consistent, and the signature field must be complete | In the search test, switch searchMode to compare candidates, and check whether the returned snippets simultaneously cover the same name's spelling in both the registration form and training records |
| Teaching plan | Course name, course code, and class-hour quantity refer back to the source text across both materials, and version numbers are synchronized | Test once each with synonymous questions, record the number of candidates and the similarity score, and check whether the teaching plan snippets correspond to the course definitions in the training records |
| Skills training record | Training item, workstation, equipment name and quantity, assessment date, instructor signature, and receipt are complete | Compare the top few rankings before and after enabling usingReRank, confirm that training record snippets are ranked in relevant positions, and separately record the array length |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term is consistent throughout the entire text, translated names can refer back to the source text, and the spelling of three sampled terms is unified | Control the number of returned items by limit, check the tokens and array length of the quoted text, and check whether the glossary entries cover the three types of materials |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The same student's name, major name, or registration date does not match between the registration form and training records. Cause: The two materials are filled in separately, without terminology back-reference and version synchronization.
- Symptom: After the teaching plan is revised, the course code and class-hour quantity in the training records are still old values. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates come from different batches of materials.
- Symptom: Skills training records lack instructor signatures or school-enterprise receipts, and quoted snippets cannot refer back to the source text. Cause: Material archiving is incomplete, and incomplete snippets are still retained after similarity filtering.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: test once each with synonymously rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-ranking on and off to observe the top few rankings; record the number of candidates and similarity, separately record the array length, and do not compare the number of quoted items with the quoting budget as equal.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, check whether translated names can refer back to the source text, and confirm that signature and receipt fields are visible in the quoted snippets.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeand run the same question in semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes respectively, recording the number of candidates and scores. - Observe the top few orders once before and after enabling
usingReRank, and uselimitto control the number of returned items, checking the tokens of the quoted text.