What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of vocational college skills competition organization, and the materials include three categories: competition regulations, registration forms, and training plans. Competition regulations are issued by the organizer and contain event names, groups, dates, and signature fields; registration forms are filled in by participating teams and contain contestant names, identity information, instructors, and acknowledgments; training plans are prepared by the coaching team and contain phase arrangements, task volumes, and inspection signatures. The three categories of materials have different update rhythms: regulation versions are adjusted with notices, registration forms are revised multiple times before the deadline, and training plans roll forward weekly. When materials enter workflow orchestration, competition regulations serve as the authoritative source for terminology and fields, registration forms provide contestant and team fields, and training plans provide time and task fields. Multilingual materials and terminology processing require first extracting terminology, translated names, quantities, and dates from the three categories of materials, then forming a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft for subsequent nodes to continue executing by branch.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch directions and interaction status records. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution by branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interactive state and records the workflow status; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Event names, groups, dates, and signature fields must be aligned item by item with the registration forms and training plans | Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference nodeId to locate that node |
| Registration forms | Contestant names, quantities, instructors, and acknowledgments must be consistent with the competition regulations and training plans | Reference variables in a subsequent node and run a trial once to check whether the selection result variable has been passed in |
| Training plans | Phase dates, task volumes, and inspection signatures must match the competition regulations and registration forms | Trigger a user selection node once, and check the node status and branch direction in the run record |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term must be consistent throughout the entire text, and translated names must be able to refer back to the source text; extract three terms and check their usage throughout the entire text | Continue executing by branch in a subsequent node, and check whether the comparison draft refers back to the source text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same event name is written differently in the competition regulations and the registration forms. Cause: The two materials were revised separately, terminology was not unified, and translated names cannot refer back to the source text.
- Phenomenon: The number of contestants does not match between the registration forms and the training plans. Cause: Versions were not synchronized; after one side was updated, the other side still used the old draft, causing dates and quantities to be misaligned.
- Phenomenon: The signature field in the competition regulations or the acknowledgment in the registration forms is missing. Cause: Signatures were not collected during the material circulation step, and no verification was performed when subsequent nodes continued executing by branch.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction status in the run record, and check whether nodeId and variables are passed as expected.
Business testing: extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the entire text, and check whether the translated names can refer back to the source text.
- Check options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm that each option corresponds to one branch.
- Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once to check whether the process continues after the interaction is completed.