What this category's data looks like
This page addresses examination organization and violation handling scenarios. The materials include three types: examination manuals, examination room records, and violation fact records. Examination manuals are issued by the examination organization department by examination batch, with fields including examination subjects, time nodes, examination room rules, and handling procedures; examination room records are filled in on the spot by invigilators, with fields including examination room number, number of candidates expected, number of candidates present, list of absentees, and signature; violation fact records are filled in by invigilators or inspectors, with fields including candidate information, description of the violation behavior, evidence list, date, and signature. The material update rhythm is distribution before each batch examination and archiving after the examination, with versions synchronized with examination notices. When entering this feature, examination manuals serve as the baseline source for terminology and procedures, while examination room records and violation fact records serve as specific record sources. Together, the three are used to generate a unified terminology glossary and a comparison draft, and to keep the same terminology consistent throughout the entire text, with translated names able to refer back to the original text.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, outputting the referenced historical message range and answer constraints. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering. If the value is too small, prior text cannot be used; if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Examination manual | The same terminology is consistent throughout the entire text, and translated names can refer back to the original text; fields such as examination subjects, time nodes, and examination room rules match those in the examination room records and violation fact records | In the application settings, check the current value of the memory turn count, run a trial with two consecutive question turns, and check whether the second turn can carry forward the reference from the first turn; spot-check the wording of three terms in the terminology glossary and comparison draft |
| Examination room record | Examination room number, number of candidates expected, number of candidates present, list of absentees, date, and signature are complete; the name, quantity, and date of the same record are consistent across the examination manual and the violation fact record | Compare the same record in the two materials and check the name, quantity, and date; check whether signatures or receipts are missing; in the prompt configuration, constrain answers to rely only on the referenced historical message range |
| Violation fact record | Candidate information, description of the violation behavior, evidence list, date, and signature are complete; the version is synchronized with the examination manual; the name, quantity, and date of the same record match those in the examination room record | Check whether the version number is synchronized with the examination notice; check signatures or receipts; run a trial with two consecutive question turns and observe whether the answer references the correct context in messages, chatId, and variables |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the examination manual and the examination room record. Cause: The terminology glossary is not unified, multilingual materials are translated separately, and there is no comparison draft referring back to the original text.
- Phenomenon: The violation fact record and the examination room record versions are not synchronized, and content from an old batch is referenced. Cause: The update rhythm is not aligned, and the memory turn count brings in old version information from earlier dialogue.
- Phenomenon: The examination room record lacks a signature or receipt, and the violation fact record lacks a date. Cause: When the materials enter this feature, fields were not checked, and the prompt configuration did not constrain the basis for answers.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries forward the reference from the first question; if the second answer is irrelevant, check whether the memory turn count is too small or whether the prompt configuration constrains the referenced historical message range.
Business test: Sample three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the entire text, and check whether the translated names can refer back to the original text; record the number of entries in the messages array and the tokens of the referenced text. Record the array entry count separately, and do not compare it for equality with the referenced content budget.
- In the application settings, check the current value of the memory turn count and match it with the prior text range required by the question; run a trial with two consecutive question turns to confirm that the second turn can correctly carry forward the reference from the first turn.
- Compare the usage records of two runs to confirm that the run consumption changes accordingly after adjusting the turn count; check whether the opening message is treated as prior text, to avoid slower answers or increased consumption.