What this category's data looks like
This page addresses corporate compliance and security training scenarios. Materials come from three categories: compliance training courseware, security operating procedures, and exam records. Compliance training courseware contains clause numbers, applicable positions, effective dates, and training version numbers; security operating procedures contain equipment names, operating steps, risk levels, and approval signature fields; exam records contain candidate names, exam paper versions, scores, invigilator signatures, and receipt status. The material update cadence is that after policy revisions, courseware and procedures are refreshed synchronously, and exam records are archived by batch. When entering this feature, courseware and procedures serve as terminology extraction sources, and exam records serve as the comparison source documents for back-referencing the original text. Multilingual materials and terminology processing are first carried by a unified terminology glossary and a comparison draft; the field characteristics require that the same term be written consistently throughout the entire text and that the translated name can back-reference the original text. Based on this, workflow orchestration strings terminology confirmation, branch selection, and comparison draft generation into a single chain for use before external release.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is continued and completed by subsequent nodes according to the branch. When the user selection node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Compliance training courseware | Whether the clause numbers, applicable positions, effective dates, and training version numbers are consistent with the exam records | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and reference the selection result variable variables in subsequent nodes and run a trial once |
| Security operating procedures | Whether the equipment names, operating steps, risk levels, and approval signature fields are missing signatures or receipts | Trigger once, check the node status in the run records, and confirm that the interaction state is recorded |
| Exam records | Whether the candidate names, exam paper versions, scores, invigilator signatures, and receipt status match the two materials | Reference nodeId in subsequent nodes to locate the node, and check whether the record's name, quantity, and date are consistent |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | Whether the same term is written consistently throughout the entire text and whether the translated name can back-reference the original text | Sample three terms to check their writing throughout the entire text, and verify whether the variables value passed falls into the comparison draft |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the courseware and the exam records. Cause: The terminology glossary was not updated synchronously, and the comparison draft was not written back after branch selection.
- Symptom: After a policy revision, the courseware and procedure versions were not synchronized, and old-version terminology is still referenced. Cause: The version number was not refreshed along with the branch direction, and the interaction state record did not trigger review.
- Symptom: Security operating procedures are missing signatures or receipts, and exam records are missing invigilator signatures. Cause: The process stops after the interaction is completed, and subsequent nodes do not continue execution according to the branch.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Run a trial for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run records, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and that the selection result variable variables has been passed to subsequent nodes.
Business testing: Sample three terms to check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and verify whether the translated names can back-reference the original text; record the number of citations separately, and check the tokens of the cited text against the quoteMaxToken budget.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, confirm that each option corresponds to one branch, and use
nodeIdto locate the node and view the interaction state records. - Reference the selection result variable
variablesin subsequent nodes and run a trial once, checking that the same term is written consistently throughout the entire text and that the translated name can back-reference the original text.