What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the establishment and annual report scenarios of Chinese-Foreign cooperative education institutions; the materials come from establishment applications, cooperation agreements, articles of association, and annual report receipts. The establishment application provides the institution name, education level, enrollment scale, and signature fields; the cooperation agreement gives the names of both the Chinese and foreign parties, the amount of capital contribution, the validity period, and the signing date; the articles of association set out the governance structure, decision-making procedures, and seal style. Annual report materials are updated by academic year, and receipts and signature pages often lag behind the main text. When the materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt features, the establishment application and cooperation agreement serve as terminology sources, the articles of association serve as the reference master copy, and the annual report receipts are used to verify whether dates and signatures are complete. Field characteristics center on institution names, professional translated names, amounts and quantities, date formats, and signature positions; the same record may appear with different spellings across different materials, so each item must be traced back to the original text in a unified terminology glossary and reference draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the range of historical messages referenced and the answer constraints. The "unified terminology glossary and reference draft" is then completed by the model. Memory turns control how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if the value is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | The institution name, education level, enrollment scale, and signature fields must correspond item by item with the cooperation agreement and articles of association | Check the memory turns value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second question picks up the reference from the first question |
| Cooperation agreement | The names of the Chinese and foreign parties, the amount of capital contribution, the validity period, and the signing date must be consistent with the articles of association and annual report receipts | Compare the usage records of two runs, confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turns, and check the date and quantity spellings |
| Articles of association | The governance structure, decision-making procedures, and seal style must be traceable to the original text, and translated names must be consistent throughout | Sample three terms and check whether their spellings are consistent throughout, and check whether signatures or receipts are complete |
| Annual report receipt | The version must be synchronized after the academic year update, and receipts and signature pages must not lag behind the main text | Pass messages and variables in the dialogue, and check the range of historical messages and the answer constraints |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same institution name is written differently in the establishment application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: the two materials were entered separately, no unified terminology glossary and reference draft was established, and the translated name cannot be traced back to the original text.
- Phenomenon: the amount of capital contribution and the signing date do not match between the two materials. Cause: the versions were not synchronized, the annual report receipt lagged behind the main text, and no item-by-item recheck was performed after the update.
- Phenomenon: signatures or receipts are missing, and the seal style in the articles of association does not match the main text. Cause: the material circulation step did not check the signature positions and receipt numbers, and the range of historical messages brought in irrelevant content.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: use two consecutive follow-up questions to see whether the second question picks up the reference from the first question, and check the memory turns value in the application settings.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spellings are consistent throughout, check that translated names can be traced back to the original text, and record the reference text tokens and array count corresponding to chatId.
- Check the current memory turns value in the application settings, and confirm that it matches the range of preceding text required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions, and check whether the second round correctly picks up the reference from the first round.