What this category's data looks like
This category's data covers the establishment application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association for Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions. Sources include multilingual texts submitted by the domestic operating party and the foreign cooperator, and the update cadence follows the establishment approval and annual report cycles. Once the materials enter parsing and training tasks, each plays a different role: the establishment application carries fields such as institution name, education level, and enrollment scale; the cooperation agreement stipulates the rights and obligations of both parties, the term, and signing information; the articles of association define the governance structure and decision-making procedures. The three types of materials often contain Chinese-English bilingual or multilingual terminology, and fields, dates, and signature information need to retain their structure during the document parsing and chunking stage. After chunking, granularity is controlled by chunkSize and chunkSplitter, providing a retrievable data-row foundation for subsequent terminology unification and parallel-text generation.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index statuses (parsed, indexing, indexed). The unified terminology glossary and parallel text are then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is complete, parsed chunks are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier. The index transitions through the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed. Data pending indexing does not participate in recall, and when the model is changed, only data that has completed indexing is rebuilt.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment application | Whether fields such as institution name, education level, and enrollment scale correspond item by item with the cooperation agreement and articles of association, and whether dates and signatures are complete | Check the same record in the application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association separately, comparing the name, quantity, and date formats; check whether the data row status is indexed, and verify the processing mode corresponding to trainingType |
| Cooperation agreement | Whether the names of both parties, cooperation term, and signing date are consistent with what is recorded in the articles of association, and whether the specific data row can be located when a signature or receipt is missing | Open the data row corresponding to the cooperation agreement and check whether the clauses remain complete after splitting by chunkSize and chunkSplitter; check whether the data rows covered by the rebuild task contain only indexed data |
| Articles of association | Whether the governance structure, decision-making procedures, and effective date are version-synchronized with the application and cooperation agreement, and whether the translated name of the same term throughout the document can be traced back to the source text | Extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the document; check whether the identifiers of file records and data rows are distinguishable, and confirm that parsed and indexing data do not participate in recall |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same institution name is written differently in the application and the cooperation agreement. Cause: multilingual materials have not had terminology unified, and after parsing and chunking they are persisted independently, lacking a parallel text to trace back to the source text.
- Symptom: the signing date or cooperation term in the cooperation agreement and the articles of association do not match. Cause: versions are not synchronized; the old version of the material was persisted first, and the new version did not overwrite the same data row.
- Symptom: material lacking a signature or acknowledgment is retrieved. Compare the source document, business acceptance conditions and the version actually matched; record material completeness separately from retrieval results.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: upload one material, observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task, and confirm that after parsing is complete it is immediately persisted as a visible data row and bound to a unique data identifier, that the index transitions through the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed, that when the model is changed only data that has completed indexing is rebuilt, and that the processing mode corresponding to trainingType and chunkSize is verified.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their usage is consistent throughout the document, and verify whether the translated names of the same term in the application, cooperation agreement, and articles of association can be traced back to the source text.
- Open the data row and check its status, confirming that it is in one of the three states parsed, indexing, or indexed and that this is consistent with what the interface displays
- Check the file records and data rows separately, confirming that the identifiers of files and data rows are distinguishable, and check whether the data rows covered by the rebuild task contain only data that has completed indexing