Document Parsing and Chunking for College Entrance Exam Application Eligibility: Handle Multilingual Materials and Terminology

Entrance Exam Eligibility: review parsing for multilingual work. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

General College Entrance Examination registration qualification review involves three core types of materials: the Gaokao registration form, household registration and student status proof, and materials for children accompanying migrating parents. Sources are the candidate's submission, the school's preliminary review, and public security household registration verification. The update rhythm is concentrated in the registration window period. Field characteristics are name, ID number, household registration address, student status number, start and end dates of enrollment, guardian information, and signed receipt. When these materials enter the document parsing and chunking function, the registration form serves as the main record carrying the candidate's identity and examination subjects, the household registration and student status proof serves as supporting material providing household registration and student status facts, and the materials for children accompanying migrating parents supplement the residence permit, social security contributions, and proof of parent-child relationship. After parsing is completed, they are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier. Subsequent retrieval and terminology comparison drafts are completed by retrieval and subsequent processing.

Configuration and implementation checks

Parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks) only output data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). The unified terminology table and comparison draft must be handled next by retrieval and subsequent processing. After parsing is completed, parsing and chunking are immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier. The index transitions through the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed. Data pending indexing does not participate in recall.

ObjectCheckVerification action
Gaokao registration formFields include name, ID number, household registration address, examination subjects, signature, and date; the name and date in the same record across two materials must be consistentCheck whether the name spelling, ID number, and household registration address in the registration form and the household registration and student status proof are identical character by character; check whether the signature and receipt are complete
Household registration and student status proofFields include student status number, start and end dates of enrollment, school seal, and handler's signature; the version must be synchronized with the registration formCheck whether the student status number and start and end dates of enrollment are consistent with those filled in the registration form; confirm that the seal and signature are not missing
Materials for children accompanying migrating parentsFields include residence permit number, social security contribution months, guardian relationship, and receipt; the quantity and dates in the same record across two materials must matchCheck whether the residence permit number and social security months are consistent with the accompanying-migrant section of the registration form; check whether the guardian relationship proof and receipt are complete
Data rowIs in one of the three states parsed, indexing, or indexed and is consistent with the interface display; rebuilding only covers indexed dataOpen the data row to check the status; separately check the file record and the data row identifier; view the data rows covered by the rebuild task; confirm that chunkSize, chunkSplitter, trainingType correspond to the processing mode

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The same candidate's name is written differently in the registration form and the household registration and student status proof. Cause: The transcription rules for multilingual materials are not unified, and the terminology table does not lock the translated name back to the original text.
  • Phenomenon: The student status number and start and end dates of enrollment do not match between the two materials. Cause: The versions are not synchronized, and the old version of the material was not replaced together with the update of the registration form.
  • Phenomenon: The materials for children accompanying migrating parents lack the guardian's signature or receipt. Cause: The material collection step did not verify the completeness of the signature and receipt, and after parsing they are still persisted as data rows.

How to verify the setup

This function's acceptance: upload one material and observe the data row status transitions and the coverage scope of the rebuild task; confirm that after parsing it is immediately persisted as visible data rows and bound to a unique data identifier, the index transitions through the three states parsed, indexing, and indexed, data pending indexing does not participate in recall, and changing the model only rebuilds data whose indexing has been completed; check that chunkSize, chunkSplitter, trainingType correspond to the processing mode.

Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire text, and confirm that the translated name can refer back to the original text.

  • Open the data row to check the status, confirm that it is in one of the three states parsed, indexing, or indexed and is consistent with the interface display; separately check the file record and the data row identifier.
  • View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, confirm that only data whose indexing has been completed is covered; the initial training covers data pending indexing and data being indexed, and the two are not interchangeable.