Model Integration and Configuration for College Entrance Exam Application Eligibility: Handle Multilingual Materials and Terminology

Entrance Exam Eligibility: review model setup for multilingual work. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

General College Entrance Examination registration qualification review involves three core types of materials: the registration form, household registration and student status proof, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers. The registration form fields include name, ID number, household registration address, examination category, and signature field; the household registration and student status proof includes the school attended, student status number, date of household registration change, and handling signature/seal; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers include residence permit number, number of months of social insurance contributions, parents' employment proof, and receipt. When the three types of materials enter this function, the registration form serves as the main record anchoring identity and examination registration information, the household registration and student status proof is used to verify the temporal continuity of household registration and student status, and the materials for children accompanying migrant workers are used to verify residence and social insurance conditions. The material source is aggregated and reported by the admissions offices of each district and county, and the update rhythm rolls with registration batches and supplementary review nodes. The field characteristics are the coexistence of multilingual translated names, inconsistent date formats, and scattered signature and receipt locations.

Configuration and implementation checks

This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology table and comparison draft are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types, and the type labels need to be checked in the model configuration.

ObjectCheckVerification action
General College Entrance Examination registration formFields include name, ID number, household registration address, examination category, and signature field; multilingual translated names must be consistent with the original text referenceCompare with the model name returned by the channel, and check the binding relationship of maxContext and maxTokens on the registration form fields
Household registration and student status proofFields include school attended, student status number, date of household registration change, and handling signature/seal; dates and signatures must mutually corroborate with the registration formCheck the quoted text budget corresponding to quoteMaxToken, separately record the number of quotations, and check whether the date of household registration change is consistent with the registration form
Materials for children accompanying migrant workersFields include residence permit number, number of months of social insurance contributions, parents' employment proof, and receipt; quantities and dates must align with the main recordCheck the binding of toolChoice in the material extraction stage, and check whether the social insurance months and receipt signature are complete
Model type and channelThe model type corresponds to the stage to be used, and the channel and key are consistent with the connected serviceCheck the type labels in the model configuration, check the channel configuration and key source, and compare with the model name returned by the channel

Three common errors

  • Phenomenon: The same candidate's name has inconsistent translated names in the registration form and the household registration and student status proof. Cause: The terminology table is not unified, the same record's name does not match across the two materials, and reference back to the original text fails.
  • Phenomenon: The number of social insurance months in the materials for children accompanying migrant workers does not match the number filled in the registration form. Cause: Versions are not synchronized; after the supplementary review node updates, the old version of the materials is still within the retrieval scope and is referenced.
  • Phenomenon: The household registration and student status proof lacks the handling signature/seal or the receipt is missing. Cause: The scanned materials do not cover the signature page, the text blocks hit by retrieval do not include the signature/seal area, and verification cannot be performed.

How to verify the setup

Acceptance for this function: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that the language model and indexing model are bound to the corresponding stages respectively, and check whether the values of maxContext, maxTokens, and quoteMaxToken are consistent with the configuration.

Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire document, and check whether the translated names of the same term in the registration form, household registration and student status proof, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers can be traced back to the original text.

  • In the model configuration, check the type labels and confirm that the five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are bound to the conversation, retrieval, reranking, and speech stages respectively.
  • Check the channel configuration and key source, compare whether the model name returned by the channel is consistent with the name listed in the documentation, and separately record the number of quotations and the tokens of the quoted text.