What this category's data looks like
In the centralized physical examination, re-examination, and restricted-major notification stages, university admissions physical examination organizations produce three types of materials: physical examination forms, re-examination applications, and restricted-major notifications, and often need to provide multilingual parallel versions. Material sources include on-site entry, return from the university hospital, and departmental aggregation. The update rhythm is multiple revisions within a batch and version sealing between batches. Field characteristics center on name, gender, date of birth, physical examination conclusion, restricted major name, re-examination item, signature, and receipt date. When entering the model integration and configuration stage, the physical examination form plays the role of the original record, the re-examination application plays the role of process circulation, and the restricted-major notification plays the role of external release. The unified terminology table and parallel versions are completed on these materials by dialogue and retrieval.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology table and parallel versions are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition. Different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Physical examination form | Fields, dates, and signatures must correspond item by item with the re-examination application and restricted-major notification; the name, quantity, and date of the same record must not mismatch | Compare the name, restricted major name, and physical examination date in the three materials, and check whether signatures and receipts are complete; check the model type annotation bound to this stage and the model name returned by the channel, and record the tokens and array count of the quoted text |
| Re-examination application | The version must be synchronized with the physical examination form, and the re-examination items and conclusion date must be traceable back to the original text | Extract three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document; check the channel configuration and key source, and confirm that the model identifier is consistent with the name listed in the document; check whether the configuration of toolChoice and quoteMaxToken corresponds to the bound stage |
| Restricted-major notification | Before external release, it must be confirmed that the translated name can be traced back to the original text; if signatures or receipts are missing, it must not be released | Check item by item the correspondence between restricted major names and physical examination conclusions, and check the receipt date; check whether maxContext and maxTokens satisfy the length of the parallel version, and separately record the quoted array count |
| Unified terminology table and parallel versions | The same term must be consistent throughout the document, and the translated name must be traceable back to the original text | Extract three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document; check the model binding relationships and channel responses, and confirm that the model identifiers used for retrieval and dialogue are consistent |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the physical examination form and the re-examination application. Cause: The two materials were revised separately without item-by-item comparison.
- Phenomenon: The restricted-major notification has been externally released, but the version has not been synchronized to the latest physical examination conclusion. Cause: Versions between batches were not sealed, and the old draft continued to be used.
- Phenomenon: The re-examination application lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: The circulation stage did not check signatures and receipt dates, and the material directly entered release.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this function: run one dialogue and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that it is consistent with the model name returned by the channel, and check whether the configuration of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice corresponds to the bound stage.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, and confirm that the translated names can be traced back to the original text.
- In the model configuration, check whether the model type annotation corresponds to the stage to be used, check the channel configuration and key source, and compare the model identifier against the model name returned by the channel.
- Extract three terms, check the spelling in the unified terminology table and parallel versions document by document, and check whether the fields, dates, and signatures of the physical examination form, re-examination application, and restricted-major notification are complete.