What this category's data looks like
Adult college entrance examination registration and admission management involves three types of materials: registration forms, care bonus-point materials, and admission rosters. The sources are recruitment and examination institutions at all levels and institutions, and the update cadence advances with registration, review, and admission batches. Registration forms contain candidate identity, application level, and preference fields; care bonus-point materials contain certificate type, issue date, and signed receipt; admission rosters contain candidate number, admitted major, and approval signature. When these three types of materials enter the document parsing and chunking function, registration forms and bonus-point materials are stored as data rows pending indexing, while admission rosters participate in retrieval and recall as already-indexed data, each serving as the draft basis for field comparison and terminology cross-reference.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by parsing and training tasks (server-side tasks), outputting data rows and index status (parsed, indexing, indexed). The unified terminology table and cross-reference draft are then completed by retrieval and subsequent processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Adult college entrance examination registration form | Fields, dates, and signatures must correspond item by item with care bonus-point materials and admission rosters | Check whether the candidate number, name, and application level in the registration form and admission roster are consistent, check whether the signature column and receipt are complete, and check whether the data row status is parsed, indexing, or indexed |
| Care bonus-point materials | Certificate type, issue date, and signature must match the registration form records | Compare the certificate name, quantity, and date in the bonus-point materials and the registration form, confirm version synchronization, and check in the chunking results whether chunkSize and chunkSplitter affect terminology boundaries |
| Admission roster | Admitted major and approval signature must form a closed loop with the registration form and bonus-point materials | Sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, check the major name, date, and signature in the roster and registration form, and confirm that data rows with completed indexing participate in rebuilding while data pending indexing does not |
| Data rows and file records | The identities of file records and data rows are kept separate, and status is consistent with the interface display | Check file records and data rows separately, confirm that the training mode corresponding to trainingType is consistent with the index status flow, and that the rebuild task covers only data with completed indexing |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the name, quantity, and date of the same candidate do not match between the registration form and the admission roster. Cause: the two material versions were not synchronized, and after parsing and chunking, the original text was not cross-checked by referring back through the unified terminology table.
- Symptom: care bonus-point materials lack a signature or receipt but still enter data rows pending indexing. Cause: the material collection step did not verify signature completeness, and after parsing was completed they were directly stored as visible data rows.
- Symptom: newly uploaded materials cannot be found. Cause: the data row is in parsed or indexing status, and data pending indexing is naturally isolated at the retrieval layer and is not recalled, so it is necessary to wait for indexing to complete.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this function: upload one material, observe the data row status flow and the coverage scope of the rebuild task, and confirm that the status flows among parsed, indexing, and indexed, and that rebuilding targets only data with completed indexing.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, check whether the terminology table and cross-reference draft can refer back to the original text, and record the number of citations and the tokens of the cited text.
- Open the data row to check the status, confirm it is consistent with the interface display, and check the file record and data row identifiers separately.
- View the data rows covered by the rebuild task, and confirm that it covers only data with completed indexing, while data pending indexing does not participate in rebuilding.