What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of multilingual materials and terminology handling for teacher qualification exams and certification. Materials include written and interview registration forms, Mandarin proficiency certificates, medical examination forms, as well as a unified terminology glossary and a comparison draft. Sources are the forms, certificates, and receipts issued by the various certification bodies and exam administering organizations, and the update cadence keeps pace with batch and policy adjustments. Field characteristics center on name, ID number, subject name, level, date, and signature fields. When materials enter the knowledge base retrieval and recall function, the registration form serves as the entry point for candidate identity and subject information, the Mandarin proficiency certificate provides the basis for language level and number, the medical examination form carries the conclusion and physician signature, and the terminology glossary and comparison draft serve as the reference source for translated names pointing back to the original text. Multilingual materials and terminology handling require that the same term be consistent throughout the entire text and that translated names can point back to the original text. The retrieval step needs to recall candidate segments from the above materials and give similarity scores, for subsequent nodes or manual work to generate the unified terminology glossary and comparison draft.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate segments and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Written and interview registration form | Name, subject, date, and signature must correspond item by item with the Mandarin proficiency certificate and medical examination form; the same record must not mismatch across the two materials | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare the registration form candidate count and scores, and check the name, subject, and date fields |
| Mandarin proficiency certificate | Level, number, and issue date must be consistent with the registration form and medical examination form; when versions are not synchronized, the latest receipt prevails | Compare the ordering of the top few results before and after enabling usingReRank, check whether the level and number point back to the original text, and record the candidate count and scores |
| Medical examination form | Conclusion, date, and physician signature must be complete; if the signature or receipt is missing, it must not enter the comparison draft | Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, check whether the medical examination form candidates contain the signature field and conclusion paragraph, and look at the segments retained after similarity filtering |
| Unified terminology glossary and comparison draft | The same term must be consistent throughout the entire text and translated names must point back to the original text; sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout | In the search test, check whether candidate segments cover the original term text, record the array count, and separately check the tokens and limit budget of the quoted text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the same candidate's name is written differently in the registration form and the Mandarin proficiency certificate. Cause: the two materials were entered in different batches, versions are not synchronized, and terminology normalization was not performed during retrieval.
- Symptom: the conclusion date on the medical examination form does not match the date on the registration form. Cause: missing signature or receipt, materials not updated in sync, and candidate segments come from an old version.
- Symptom: the same term has inconsistent translated names before and after in the comparison draft. Cause: candidate recall is incomplete, key segments are trimmed after similarity filtering, and the original text is not pointed back to.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidate counts and scores, then toggle re-rank on and off to see the ordering of the top few results; switch searchMode and adjust similarity and limit, and check the order changes before and after usingReRank.
Business test: sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout, check whether translated names can point back to the original text, record the array count, and separately check the tokens of the quoted text.
- In the knowledge base search test, retrieve the same term once each with different question phrasings, record the candidate count and scores, and compare the ordering of the top few results before and after toggling re-rank.
- Sample three terms to check whether the wording is consistent throughout, check whether translated names can point back to the original text, record the quoted array count, and separately check the tokens and
limitbudget of the quoted text.