What this category's data looks like
The research funding budget adjustment and reimbursement scenario involves three types of materials: budget adjustment applications, reimbursement forms, and contract invoices, often containing multilingual attachments and terminology. Budget adjustment applications record account subjects, amounts, and approval dates; reimbursement forms record expense details, quantities, and handler signatures; contract invoices record counterparty names, amounts, and invoice dates. The materials originate from project teams and financial circulation, with update cadence advancing along approval milestones, and field characteristics include names, quantities, dates, signatures, and receipts. When entering the model access and configuration stage, the three types of materials serve as inputs for terminology extraction and comparison, with a unified terminology glossary and comparison draft as outputs, for external release use.
Configuration and implementation checks
This stage is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology glossary and comparison draft are subsequently completed by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. Models are divided into five categories: language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition, and different stages bind different model types.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Budget adjustment application | Check whether the account subject name, adjustment amount, approval date, and signature field are consistent with the reimbursement form | Compare against the reimbursement form and contract invoice, verifying names, quantities, and dates item by item; check whether signatures and receipts are complete |
| Reimbursement form | Check whether the expense name, quantity, handler date, and signature are consistent with the contract invoice | Compare against the contract invoice and budget adjustment application, recording discrepancies; check whether versions are synchronized |
| Contract invoice | Check whether the counterparty name, amount, invoice date, and receipt are consistent with the reimbursement form | Compare against the reimbursement form and budget adjustment application, verifying item by item; check the model identifier and the name returned by the channel |
| Model binding relationship | Check whether the five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages to be used | Verify type annotations in the model configuration; compare against the model names returned by the channel; check maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the budget adjustment application and the reimbursement form. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without cross-checking.
- Symptom: The contract invoice and reimbursement form versions are not synchronized, and the old version is still in circulation. Cause: No unified replacement after updating, and no version marking.
- Symptom: The reimbursement form lacks a signature or the contract invoice lacks a receipt. Cause: The circulation stage was not fully collected, and no check was performed before archiving.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run one conversation and one retrieval, and check whether the model identifier in the response is consistent with the model name returned by the channel; check the binding relationships of maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the entire document
- Verify type annotations in the model configuration, and confirm that the five model categories—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—correspond to the stages to be used.
- Compare the channel configuration and key sources, and check whether the model names returned by the channel are consistent with the names listed in the documentation.