What this category's data looks like
Materials in the academic misconduct report investigation and processing category include report materials, investigation reports, and expert appraisal opinions. Sources are the acceptance registration, investigation and evidence collection, and expert deliberation stages, and updates are synchronized with supplementary materials and review conclusions. Field characteristics: report materials record the reported person, the matter, the evidence list, and the acceptance date; investigation reports record the investigation process, established facts, handling recommendations, signatures, and receipts; expert appraisal opinions record the appraisal matters, conclusions, expert signatures, and dates. When the three materials enter this function, the report materials and investigation reports serve as the multilingual parallel source text, and the expert appraisal opinions serve as the basis for terminology back-reference. The unified terminology table and parallel text are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the server-side model channel configuration, outputting model binding relationships and channel responses. The unified terminology table and parallel text are completed subsequently by AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work. The five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are bound respectively to the corresponding stages, and model identifiers are compared with the model names returned by the channel.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Report materials | Fields, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item with the investigation report and expert appraisal opinions; the name, quantity, and date of the same record must not differ in two places | Check the channel configuration and key source, confirm that the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation, and inspect the maxContext and maxTokens settings |
| Investigation report | The version must be synchronized with the expert appraisal opinions, and signatures and receipts must not be missing | Compare against the model name returned by the channel, check the indexing model type annotation, and inspect the quoteMaxToken reference content budget |
| Expert appraisal opinions | The appraisal conclusion must be consistent with the facts established in the investigation report, and expert signatures and dates must be complete | Check the reranking model binding relationship, confirm that the model type corresponds to the retrieval stage, and inspect the toolChoice configuration |
| Unified terminology table and parallel text | The same term must be written consistently throughout the entire text, and the translated name must be able to back-reference the source text | Sample three terms and check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and check that the tokens and array item count of the quoted text are recorded separately |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the report materials and the investigation report. Cause: The two materials were not synchronized according to the same source text, and the terminology table was not unified in advance.
- Phenomenon: The version of the investigation report was not synchronized, and the expert appraisal opinions cite facts from an old version. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the receipt and signature confirmation step was missing.
- Phenomenon: Retrieval reports an indexing model-related error or authentication failure. Cause: The channel key is inconsistent with the connected service, and the model type is incorrectly matched to the stage.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: run one conversation and one retrieval, check the model identifier in the response, confirm that it matches the name listed in the documentation, and inspect the maxContext, maxTokens, quoteMaxToken, and toolChoice configurations.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their writing is consistent throughout the entire text, and verify that the translated names can back-reference the source text.
- In the model configuration, check the type annotations and confirm that the five types of models—language, indexing, reranking, speech synthesis, and speech recognition—are bound respectively to the corresponding stages.
- Check the channel configuration and key source, compare against the model name returned by the channel, and confirm that the model identifier matches the name listed in the documentation.