What this category's data looks like
In the initial review stage of academic journal submissions, materials usually include three types: the submitted manuscript, the author information form, and the plagiarism check report. The manuscript carries the main text and figures/tables, the author information form records authorship, affiliations, order, and contact details, and the plagiarism check report gives the similarity rate and comparison sources. The three types of materials come from different sources and update at different rhythms: the manuscript may be re-uploaded after author revisions, the information form is revised as authorship adjustments are made, and the plagiarism check report is generated separately by submission batch. When entering the multilingual materials and terminology processing workflow, the manuscript is the main basis for terminology extraction and anaphoric reference to translated names, the author information form provides the standard written forms of personal names and institution names, and the plagiarism check report is used to confirm the version and submission time. Field characteristics center on names, quantities, dates, and signatures: the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the two materials need to match, versions need to be synchronized, and signatures or receipts need to be complete. When these materials enter multi-turn dialogue and prompt processing, they each serve the roles of source text provenance, standard comparison, and version evidence.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the memory turn count and prompt configuration in the application settings, and the output references the historical message range and answer constraints. The "unified terminology list and comparison draft" is then completed by the model. The memory turn count controls how many previous dialogue turns can be referenced at most when answering; if the value is too small, the preceding text cannot be used, and if it is too large, irrelevant content is brought in and consumption increases.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Submitted manuscript | Terminology is consistent throughout, and translated names can refer back to the source text | Check the memory turn count value in the application settings, run a trial with two consecutive questions, and use a reference in the second question to see whether it can carry over from the first question; check in messages whether the historical message range covers the place where the terminology first appears |
| Author information form | The names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the two materials match | Check item by item against the manuscript authorship and the information form, and confirm that institution names, author order, and dates are consistent; compare the written forms of personal names and institution names in variables with the information form |
| Plagiarism check report | Versions are synchronized, and signatures or receipts are complete | Check whether the submission date and the manuscript version number are consistent, and check whether signatures and receipts are updated with the version; compare the usage records of two runs to confirm the consumption change after adjusting the turn count |
| Unified terminology list and comparison draft | The same terminology is written consistently throughout | Sample three terms and check whether their written forms are consistent throughout, and confirm that the terminology in the session corresponding to chatId has not been rewritten |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the second question answers off-topic when a reference is used. Cause: the memory turn count value is too small, so the preceding terminology and reference relationships are not brought into the answer range.
- Symptom: the names, quantities, and dates of the same record in the two materials do not match. Cause: the manuscript and author information form versions are not synchronized, and the comparison was not backfilled after revision.
- Symptom: the plagiarism check report lacks a signature or receipt. Cause: the submission batch and manuscript version are not bound, and the receipt was not archived together when the version was updated.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question carries over the reference from the first question; check the memory turn count value in the application settings, use messages to check the historical message range, use variables to check terminology written forms, and use chatId to locate the same session.
Business test: sample three terms and check whether their written forms are consistent throughout, and confirm that translated names can refer back to the source text.
- Check the current memory turn count value in the application settings and match it with the preceding text range required by the question.
- Run a trial with two consecutive questions and confirm that the second round correctly carries over the reference from the first round.