What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the scenario of journal publishing licenses and annual verification. The materials cover three types: journal publishing license, annual verification form, and rectification report. The sources are publishing administrative departments and journal sponsoring units, and the update cadence follows the annual verification cycle and rectification deadlines. Field characteristics center on license number, journal name, sponsoring unit, publication period, verification year, rectification items, signatures, and receipt dates. When the materials enter the multi-turn dialogue and prompts feature, the license serves as the anchor for subject qualification, the verification form serves as the working paper for annual data verification, and the rectification report serves as the problem items and closed-loop evidence. Together, the three types of materials constitute the factual boundary for terminology extraction and generation of comparison drafts, and multilingual materials and terminology handling proceed on this basis.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the memory turns and prompt configuration in the application settings, which output the historical message range and answer constraints for reference. The "unified terminology glossary and comparison draft" is then completed by the model. External entry points and authorization are handled by the publishing service and file permissions; memory turns and prompts do not generate access entry points and do not perform identity or file authentication.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publishing license | The license number, journal name, sponsoring unit, publication period, and valid dates must correspond item by item with the annual verification form | Check the memory turns in the application settings, use two consecutive question turns to confirm the reference of license fields, and inspect the historical message range under chatId |
| Annual verification form | The verification year, publication period, publication quantity, signatures, and receipt dates must be consistent with the license and the rectification report | Sample three terms to check their spelling throughout the document, compare the dates, quantities, and signatures between the annual verification form and the rectification report, and record the reference continuity in messages |
| Rectification report | The rectification items, completion dates, signatures, and receipts must be synchronized with the version of the annual verification form | Check the version numbers and receipts of the rectification report and the verification form, and confirm that the terminology translations in variables can refer back to the original text |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: The same journal name is written differently in the license and the annual verification form. Cause: Multilingual materials have not unified terminology, and the model brings in old translations when referencing historical messages.
- Phenomenon: The dates and quantities in the verification form and the rectification report do not match. Cause: Versions are not synchronized, and old-version materials remain within the historical message range.
- Phenomenon: The rectification report lacks signatures or receipts. Cause: Field completeness was not checked when the materials entered the dialogue, and the answer constraints did not cover evidence items.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: Ask two consecutive follow-up questions and see whether the second question inherits the reference from the first question; in the first question, give the journal name and year, and in the second question, use a reference to ask about the rectification date, and confirm that the answer does not go off track.
Business test: Sample three terms to check whether their spelling is consistent throughout the document, and confirm that the translations can refer back to the original text.
- Check the memory turns in the application settings to match the preceding context range required by the question, and compare the usage records of two runs.
- Run a trial with two consecutive question turns, check the reference continuity in the second turn, and verify the terminology and historical message range in
chatId,messages, andvariables.