What this category's data looks like
Journal publication license and annual verification materials include journal publication licenses, annual verification forms, rectification reports, and multilingual parallel texts. They originate from publication administrative acceptance and annual inspection archiving, and their update cadence advances with license changes, annual verification cycles, and rectification receipts. Field characteristics center on entity name, publication number, publication period, quantity, issuance and verification dates, and signature and receipt columns. When the materials enter knowledge base retrieval and recall, the license and verification form serve as the primary records providing the field baseline, the rectification report provides change and supplementary explanations, and the multilingual materials and terminology glossary assume responsibility for translated-name back-reference and whole-document consistency; each material serves as a cross-reference basis for the others in retrieval.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The unified terminology glossary and parallel texts are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Journal publication license | The name, publication number, publication period, issuance date, and signature column are written consistently in both materials | In the search test, search once each by publication number and journal name, check the name, date, and signature column in the candidate chunks, record the number of candidates and the score, and check the recall form of searchMode |
| Annual verification form | The name, quantity, date, and version number of the same record match between the license and the verification form | Search by the combination of verification year and entity name, compare the quantity and date in the candidate chunks of the two materials, and confirm version synchronization; use similarity to observe whether low-scoring candidates are filtered out |
| Rectification report | The rectification items, receipt, and signature column are complete and correspond to the verification form version | Search the rectification item keywords, check whether the receipt and signature column in the candidate chunks are complete, and record the tokens and array count of the cited text separately |
| Multilingual terminology parallel text | The same term is consistent throughout the document, and the translated name can back-reference the source text | Extract three terms and search them separately, check whether the term wording in the candidate chunks is consistent, and compare the ranking of the top few items before and after enabling re-rank; if necessary, use limit and usingReRank to adjust the candidate range |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the license and the annual verification form. Cause: The two materials were entered separately without field cross-checking, and the discrepancy was not discovered after retrieval hit their respective chunks.
- Symptom: The rectification report and the verification form versions are not synchronized, and the candidate chunks cite the old version's wording. Cause: The update cadences differ, the old version material is still participating in recall in the knowledge base, and version identification is lacking.
- Symptom: The candidate chunks lack the signature column or receipt content, and the citation is incomplete. Cause: After similarity filtering and citation upper-limit trimming, only some chunks are retained, and key passages are not recalled.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance of this feature: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare the candidate chunks and similarity scores, then toggle re-rank on and off to observe changes in the ranking of the top few items, and record the number of candidates and the tokens of the cited text.
Business test: extract three terms and check whether their wording is consistent throughout the document, and confirm that the translated names can back-reference the source text.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchModeamong semantic, full-text, and hybrid forms, and compare the number of candidates and scores for the same term. - Check the name, quantity, date, signature, and receipt fields of the license, verification form, and rectification report in the candidate chunks, and confirm version synchronization before submitting for external release.