What this category's data looks like
During the deployment, operations, and application handover stage for primary and secondary school admissions organizations, materials are mainly of three types: admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. The admissions plan contains batches, time nodes, responsible persons, and signature fields; the application material checklist contains material names, number of copies, submission dates, and receipts; the admission list contains student names, admission batches, dates, and review signatures. The material sources are the school admissions office, grade groups, and the information center. The update rhythm advances with the admissions stages: the plan is set first, the checklist rolls with applications, and the list is finalized after admission. When entering workflow orchestration, the plan serves as the basis for branching, the checklist serves as the item-by-item verification object, and the list serves as the final output reference. The names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the three must be consistent between the two materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branching), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branch. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state. After the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields include batch, date, and signature; if the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the two materials, it is inconsistent | Check the batch name, date, and signature fields of the plan and the application material checklist, and compare them item by item once |
| Application material checklist | Fields include material name, number of copies, submission date, and receipt; if the version is not synchronized, or a signature or receipt is missing, it is inconsistent | Check the student names, number of copies, and dates in the checklist and the admission list, and check whether receipts are complete |
| Admission list | Fields include student name, admission batch, date, and review signature; if the names and quantities in the two materials do not match, it is inconsistent | Check the batches in the list and the plan, and the number of copies in the checklist, and confirm that signatures and dates are consistent |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch; the interaction state is recorded; the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes | In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, run a trial once to view the node status in the run record, reference variables in subsequent nodes, and check nodeId |
Three common errors
- Symptom: after selecting an option, the default branch is still taken. Cause: the options and branch connections were not checked item by item, and the interaction state record was not aligned with the branch direction, causing the branch judgment to deviate from the selection result.
- Symptom: the name, quantity, or date of the same record does not match between the two materials. Cause: the admissions plan, application material checklist, and admission list are each updated separately, versions are not synchronized, and unified verification is lacking.
- Symptom: the process stops after the interaction is completed. Cause: the selection result variable was not passed to subsequent nodes, or the same session repeatedly enters the interaction, and the node status is missing from the run record.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, confirm that the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes, and check that the variables and nodeId references are consistent.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and focus on checking the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the admissions plan, application material checklist, and admission list.
- In the node, check the options and branch connections one by one, trigger the user selection node once, and view the node status and branch direction in the run record.
- Reference the selection result variable in subsequent nodes and run a trial once, check
variablesandnodeId, and confirm that the version, connection, and task record on the handover form are consistent.