What this category's data looks like
This page is intended for primary and secondary school admissions organizations. The materials include admissions plans, application material checklists, and admission lists. Admissions plans are updated by annual version and contain application conditions, time nodes, and admission rules; application material checklists are synchronized with the plans and list fields such as household registration, property, and student status; admission lists are finalized after the batch ends and contain student names, admitted schools, and signed receipts. When the three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval service, their roles differ: admissions plans and material checklists are recalled as rule bases, while admission lists are retrieved as result records. The update rhythm is plans first, checklists follow, and lists last; fields and dates must be aligned item by item.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, rerank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Admissions plan | Fields, dates, and signatures must be consistent with the application material checklist, and version numbers must be synchronized | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare candidate chunks and scores, and check whether the plan version and checklist version come from the same source |
| Application material checklist | Names, quantities, and dates must match the admission list; missing signatures or receipts means unqualified | Test once each with the same question, observe whether candidates include both semantic and full-text results, and check whether key chunks are retained after similarity filtering |
| Admission list | Student names, admitted schools, and receipt signatures in the list must correspond item by item with the checklist | Enable and disable rerank, compare the order of the top few items; record the number of candidates and scores, and record the number of quoted items separately by array length; do not compare quoteMaxToken |
| Deployment status and operation records | Version, connection, and task records must be consistent, and the handover form must be checkable item by item | Check the version number, connection status, and task records against the handover form, and confirm that the values of usingReRank and limit have been written into the operation records |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The names, quantities, and dates of the same record do not match between the admissions plan and the application material checklist. Cause: The two materials' versions are not synchronized, and retrieval recall matches by old-version fields, causing conflicting candidate chunks.
- Symptom: The admission list lacks signatures or receipts, so batch completion cannot be confirmed during handover. Cause: The signature column was not filled in after the list was finalized, and the retrieval service only returns candidate chunks and does not add signatures.
- Symptom: The same question cannot be recalled when rephrased, and although there are many candidates, the ones ranked at the top are irrelevant. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, rerank is not enabled, and key paragraphs are lost after similarity filtering and upper-limit trimming of quotes.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidate chunks and similarity scores, then enable and disable rerank to inspect the ordering of the top few items; switch searchMode to observe differences between semantic and full-text results, and record the number of candidates and scores.
Business testing: check item by item against the handover form once to see which record is missing; check the fields, dates, and signatures of the admissions plan, application material checklist, and admission list, and confirm that version, connection, and task records are consistent.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch
searchMode, compare candidate chunks and scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and confirm that they match the material form. - Enable and disable rerank, compare the order of the top few items; check the tokens and array count of the quoted text after
similarityfiltering, record them separately, and do not comparequoteMaxToken.