What this category's data looks like
This page addresses the student disciplinary action and appeal handling scenario. The materials include three types: disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision documents, and appeal statements. Disciplinary fact materials are submitted by the investigating party and record the course of conduct, time and place, and witnesses; disciplinary decision documents are issued by the unit that made the decision and state the basis clauses, type of disciplinary action, and effective date; appeal statements are submitted by the student or an agent and set out the requests, reasons, and evidence list. The three types of materials each play different roles in the flow: fact materials support the determination, decision documents fix the conclusion, and appeal statements initiate review. Field characteristics center on four items: name, quantity, date, and signature. The update rhythm changes as the disciplinary process advances, and is filled in round by round from acceptance, service, appeal, to review. When materials enter the conversation logs and auditing function, they are only retrieved and exported as session evidence, without changing their business attributes.
Configuration and implementation checks
This part is executed by the conversation record interface (by application and session dimension), outputting the session message list and total record count, including role and citation information. "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are then completed by manual or external systems.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Disciplinary fact materials | Name, quantity, date, and signature correspond item by item between the fact materials and the decision document | Retrieve the entries for the same record in both materials, compare name and quantity, and check the signature date and signature field |
| Disciplinary decision document | Type of disciplinary action, basis clauses, and effective date are consistent between the decision document and the appeal statement | Search the cited section of the appeal statement by decision document number, check the type of disciplinary action and effective date, and inspect whether the receipt is attached to the file |
| Appeal statement | Appeal requests, reasons, and evidence list are aligned between the appeal statement and the review record | Compare the appeal requests and evidence list item by item, check the acceptance date and signature, and confirm the version number is synchronized |
| Conversation record interface | The total record count and response code of 200 can be verified, and after paginating through all records, the role and citation information is complete | Use chatId and dataId to locate a single record, check the value field and time, and compare the total record count total while paging |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name and quantity of the same record do not match between the fact materials and the decision document. Cause: The two places were entered separately and were not backfilled according to the same number, resulting in field misalignment.
- Symptom: The disciplinary decision document has been updated, but the appeal statement still cites the old version of the clauses. Cause: The version was not synchronized, and the review step did not re-compare against the latest decision document.
- Symptom: The appeal statement lacks the student's signature or the service receipt. Cause: The signature field was not checked item by item during the flow, and only the conclusion was checked during handover, not the attachments.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: paginate through all records by total record count, sample one record to check the role, citation information, and time, confirm that _id, dataId and value can be located, and that response code of 200 matches the total record count total.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and focus on checking whether the name, quantity, date, and signature of the disciplinary fact materials, disciplinary decision document, and appeal statement are complete.
- Initiate a paginated request by application and session identifier, pull two pages in succession to compare the offset and total record count, and confirm that the number of records matches the total.
- Open one record to check the role field, citations, and elapsed time field, confirm that message roles correspond to the original conversation, and record the citation count separately according to the array length.