What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management materials include training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. They come from supervisors, colleges, and graduate schools, and their update cadence advances by semester and key milestones. Training plans contain course, credit, and direction fields; proposal reports contain title, date, and review signature; mid-term assessment forms contain progress, outcomes, and assessment conclusion. When these materials enter workflow orchestration, the training plan serves as the branch starting point, while the proposal report and mid-term assessment form serve as inputs for subsequent nodes, each playing a different role: the training plan drives option branches, and the proposal report and mid-term assessment form continue to flow according to the branches, forming a handover-ready deployment state and operation records.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by workflow nodes (user selection and branches), outputting branch directions and interaction state records. The handover-ready deployment state and operation records are completed by subsequent nodes continuing execution according to the branches. When a node is triggered, the conversation enters an interaction state and records the workflow state; after the user completes the selection, execution continues along the branch corresponding to the selected option.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Fields, dates, and signatures must be aligned item by item with the proposal report and mid-term assessment form | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and confirm the branch direction corresponding to the training plan |
| Proposal report | The name, quantity, and date of the same record in the two materials must be consistent | Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and check the proposal report branch |
| Mid-term assessment form | The version must be synchronized, and signatures or receipts must not be missing | Reference the selection result variable in a subsequent node and run a trial once, and check the mid-term assessment form fields |
| User selection node | Each option corresponds to one branch, and the interaction state is recorded | Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and check whether the selection result variable has been passed to subsequent nodes |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The name, quantity, and date of the same record do not match between the training plan and the proposal report. Cause: The two materials were entered separately and were not checked against the same field definitions.
- Symptom: The version of the mid-term assessment form is not synchronized, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: After the material was updated, the branch was not run again, and the old version still remained in the node input.
- Symptom: After selecting an option, the default branch is still followed, and the process stops after the interaction is completed. Cause: The options and branch connections were not checked one by one, and the selection result variable was not passed to subsequent nodes.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: run trials for each option one by one, check the branch direction and interaction state in the run record, and check whether variables, nodeId, and the selection result variable are correctly referenced by subsequent nodes.
Business test: check once item by item according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and confirm that the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form are consistent.
- Check the options and branch connections one by one in the node, and record the correspondence between
nodeIdandvariables. - Trigger a user selection node once, view the node status in the run record, and confirm that the interaction state is recorded.