What this category's data looks like
Graduate training process management materials include training plans, proposal reports, and mid-term assessment forms. Sources are supervisor submission, college review, and system archiving, and the update cadence advances by semester milestones. Training plans contain course and credit fields, proposal reports contain topic selection, date, and supervisor signature, and mid-term assessment forms contain assessment conclusion, date, and signature. The three material types play different roles when entering knowledge base retrieval and recall: training plans are retrieved as the basis for the training program, proposal reports are recalled as records of the topic selection process, and mid-term assessment forms are cited as evidence of stage assessment. The field characteristic is that the same record must be aligned across materials in name, quantity, and date, versions must be synchronized, and signatures and receipts must be complete. After materials enter this feature, retrieval results serve as candidate chunks and similarity scores, for subsequent nodes or manual work to generate a handover-ready deployment status and operation record.
Configuration and implementation checks
This step is executed by the knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test), outputting candidate chunks and similarity scores (after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming). The handover-ready deployment status and operation record are then completed by subsequent nodes or manually.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Training plan | Whether course names, credit quantities, and dates are consistent in the proposal report and mid-term assessment form | In the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, compare candidate chunks and scores, and verify fields and dates |
| Proposal report | Whether the topic name, date, and supervisor signature are aligned in the training plan and mid-term assessment form | Turn usingReRank on or off, observe changes in the order of the top candidate chunks, and check whether signatures and receipts are missing |
| Mid-term assessment form | Whether the assessment conclusion, date, and signature are synchronized in the training plan and proposal report | Adjust similarity and limit, observe the number of candidate chunks and scores, and verify whether versions and dates are consistent |
| Knowledge base retrieval service | Whether candidate chunks and similarity scores are output after mode, merge, re-rank, filter, and limit trimming | Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, record the number of candidate chunks and scores, and check the completeness of cited text |
Three common errors
- Symptom: The course names and credit quantities of the same record do not match between the training plan and the mid-term assessment form. Cause: Material versions are not synchronized, and retrieval candidates do not cover the latest fields.
- Symptom: The dates in the proposal report and mid-term assessment form are inconsistent, and signatures or receipts are missing. Cause: During archiving, items were not checked one by one against the handover list, and key chunks were lost after citation limit trimming.
- Symptom: There are many candidates, but the ones ranked at the front are all irrelevant, and the answer lacks key paragraphs. Cause: The retrieval mode does not match the material form, re-rank is not enabled, or similarity filtering is too loose.
How to verify the setup
Feature acceptance: Test once each with synonym-rewritten questions, compare candidate chunks and similarity scores, then turn re-rank on and off to observe the ranking of the top candidate chunks; check the values of searchMode, usingReRank, similarity, and limit, and record the number of candidate chunks and scores.
Business test: Check once item by item against the handover list to see which record is missing; verify the fields, dates, and signatures of the training plan, proposal report, and mid-term assessment form, and confirm that versions, connections, and task records are consistent.
- In the knowledge base search test, switch retrieval modes, compare candidate chunks and similarity scores, and record the number of candidate chunks and scores.
- Turn re-rank on or off, compare the order of the top candidate chunks, check the tokens and array length of the cited text, and record them separately.