What this category's data looks like
The materials for deployment, operations, and application handover in vocational college skills competition organization are mainly competition regulations, registration forms, training plans, deployment status, and operation records. The competition regulations give the event name, group, date, and signature field, and serve as the baseline for version and process; the registration form carries contestant names, counts, units, and receipt signatures; the training plan records phase tasks, dates, and instructor signatures. When these three types of materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each serves as a citation source: the regulations are used to check the version and date, the registration form is used to check names and counts, and the training plan is used to check phases and signatures. The update rhythm changes with event notices, registration deadlines, and the advancement of training phases, and the field characteristics are the four categories of name, count, date, and signature. At handover, the deployment status and operation records must correspond item by item with the above materials to form a handover-ready ledger basis.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of citation content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Competition regulations | Whether the version, date, and signature field are consistent with the deployment status | Open the citation marker, compare the event name, group, date, and signature in the original regulations text, and record them in the handover form |
| Registration form | Whether contestant names, counts, units, and receipt signatures match the training plan | Compare the names, counts, and dates in the registration form and training plan item by item, and mark those missing signatures or receipts |
| Training plan | Whether phase tasks, dates, and instructor signatures are consistent with the operation records | Check the training plan's phases, dates, and signatures item by item according to the handover form, and record missing items |
| Citation content output | Whether the number of returned items matches the materials hit; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that has no matching materials, and see whether the array is empty while the chain continues; check responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled) and quoteList, record the count separately, and do not compare it for equality with quoteMaxToken |
Three common errors
- Phenomenon: the same contestant name is written differently in the registration form and the training plan, and the counts also do not match. Cause: the two materials are updated separately, and no unified check of names and counts has been made.
- Phenomenon: the competition regulations version is not synchronized, and the deployment status is still executed according to the old date. Cause: after the regulations were updated, the operation records were not written back, and the version and date were not compared item by item.
- Phenomenon: the training plan lacks the instructor's signature or receipt, and there is no corresponding record on the handover form. Cause: the signature step was not included in the material flow, so it cannot be checked item by item at handover.
How to verify the setup
This function's acceptance: ask a question with original-text support, and check whether the citation array and citation markers can point back to the original paragraphs; then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the chain runs through.
Business test: check once item by item according to the handover form, and see which record is missing.
- Open the search parameter panel and check item by item, confirm that the associated knowledge base uses the same vector model, and record the citation count and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget; do not compare the two for equality. - In the conversation, open the citation markers, compare them with the source documents, check the original text fragments and source identifiers in
quoteListwithinresponseData, and confirm that each citation can point back to the original paragraphs.