Knowledge Base Retrieval for College Entrance Exam Application Eligibility: Coordinate Operations and Application Handover

Entrance Exam Eligibility: review retrieval for operational handover. Check source versions, input mappings and the values received by downstream nodes.

What this category's data looks like

This page addresses the general college entrance examination registration qualification review scenario. Materials include three categories: the college entrance examination registration form, household registration and student status certificates, and materials for children accompanying migrant workers. The registration form fields include name, ID number, graduating school, examination subject category, and signature field; the household registration and student status certificates include household registration address, move-in date, student status number, and school seal; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers include residence permit number, number of months of social insurance contributions, parents' employment certificate, and receipt. Materials are updated according to the enrollment cycle; before each round of review, they are summarized by the registration point, and paper copies are scanned and entered into the knowledge base. When entering this function, the registration form serves as the main record providing the candidate's identity and registration information; the household registration and student status certificates serve as supporting evidence providing household registration and student status fields; the materials for children accompanying migrant workers serve as a supplement providing residence and social insurance fields. The three material categories each assume the role of field source, and during retrieval they are aligned by name, date, and number for subsequent nodes to check consistency.

Configuration and implementation checks

The knowledge base retrieval service (retrieval node and search test) only outputs candidate snippets and similarity scores (after pattern, merge, re-rank, filter, and upper-limit trimming). The deployable state and operation records that can be handed over must be continued by subsequent nodes or manually. This step does not produce statistical tables, business documents, or authorization results; it only passes candidates and cited content to the next step.

ObjectCheckVerification action
College entrance examination registration formCandidate name, ID number, graduating school, examination subject category, and signature field are complete, and are consistent with the name and ID number in the household registration and student status certificatesIn the search test, switch searchMode to semantic, full-text, or hybrid, check whether candidate snippets cover the key fields of the registration form, and record the number of candidates and scores
Household registration and student status certificatesHousehold registration address, move-in date, student status number, and school seal are consistent with the corresponding fields in the registration form, and there are no date contradictionsTest once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores; after enabling re-rank, see whether the top few rankings are closer to the household registration and student status fields
Materials for children accompanying migrant workersResidence permit number, number of months of social insurance contributions, parents' employment certificate, and receipt are complete, and the number can correspond to the registration form and household registration and student status certificatesCheck whether the returned citations include both semantic and full-text results, check changes in candidate order before and after enabling usingReRank, and record the number of citations
Retrieval parameters and trimmingAfter candidates undergo similarity filtering and citation upper-limit trimming, key original snippets are still retained, and the similarity and limit settings do not cause key paragraphs to be lostAdjust similarity to observe changes in the number of candidates and scores, separately record the number of items in the citation array, and check whether the tokens of the cited text are within budget

Three common errors

  • Symptom: The same candidate name is written differently in the registration form and the household registration and student status certificates, and retrieval candidates do not match. Cause: The two materials were not unified by name when entered, and hits and associations were not checked first.
  • Symptom: The number of months of social insurance contributions in the materials for children accompanying migrant workers contradicts the date filled in the registration form, and candidate snippets lack key paragraphs. Cause: Versions were not synchronized, and old-version materials remain in the knowledge base.
  • Symptom: The household registration and student status certificates lack a school seal or receipt, and retrieval returns incomplete citations. Cause: Signatures or receipts were missing during material handover, and items were not checked one by one according to the handover list.

How to verify the setup

This function's acceptance: test once each with synonymous rewritten questions, compare candidates and scores, then toggle re-rank on and off to see the top few rankings; switch searchMode to check differences between semantic and full-text candidates, and record the number of candidates and scores.

Business test: check once item by item according to the handover list to see which item is missing from the record; check whether version, connection, and task records are consistent, record the number of citations separately, and do not compare cited text tokens with limit for equality.

  • In the knowledge base search test, switch searchMode, compare the number of candidates and scores across semantic, full-text, and hybrid modes, and confirm that returned citations include key original snippets.
  • Test once each with usingReRank enabled and disabled, compare changes in the top few rankings; after adjusting similarity and limit, re-record the number of candidates, and check whether the cited text tokens are within budget.