What this category's data looks like
The materials for general higher education institution admissions enrollment and filing mainly fall into three categories: enrollment plans, filing rules, and admission rosters. Enrollment plans include institution-major groups, planned numbers, subject selection requirements, and adjustment records; filing rules include filing ratios, tie-breaking sorting, batches, and dates; admission rosters include candidate numbers, scores, majors, and signed receipts. When these materials enter the knowledge base retrieval node, each plays the role of a cited source: plans are used to verify quantities and major group names, rules are used to verify dates and batch criteria, and rosters are used to verify signatures and receipts. The sources are official documents issued by provincial admissions and examination institutions and institution receipts; the update cadence keeps pace with batch progression and plan adjustments, and the field characteristics are the coexistence of multiple versions and the appearance of same-named fields across materials.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is executed by the citation output of the knowledge base retrieval node, which outputs an array of cited content, each item containing the original text fragment and source identifier, and the length may be 0. The handover-ready deployment status and operation records are then completed by subsequent AI nodes, code nodes, or manual work.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Enrollment plan | Whether the institution-major group names, planned numbers, subject selection requirements, and adjustment dates match between the plan table and the filing rule attachment | Compare the major group names and planned numbers in the two materials item by item, and record discrepancies and corresponding dates |
| Filing rules | Whether the filing ratio, tie-breaking sorting, batch dates, and signed receipts are complete and version-consistent | Check the version number and issue date of the rule text, and check whether the receipts are fully attached |
| Admission roster | Whether candidate numbers, scores, admitted majors, and signatures are consistent between the roster and the receipts | Check signatures and receipts page by page against the roster, and mark records missing signatures or receipts |
| Cited content output | The number of returned items is consistent with the matched materials; being empty is also normal | Run a test with a question that matches no materials, see that the output is empty while the pipeline continues, and record the array length and the quoteMaxToken budget values separately |
Three common errors
- Symptom: the major group names and planned numbers for the same record do not match between the plan table and the filing rule attachment. Cause: material versions were not synchronized, or only one material was changed after adjustment.
- Symptom: the admission roster is missing signatures or receipts, and records are found to be incomplete when checking the handover form. Cause: receipts were not archived with the batch, or a signature step was omitted.
- Symptom: there are no citation superscripts in the answer, or the cited fragments do not match the original text. Cause: no materials were matched in this round, or which material was matched was not verified first; it should not be directly attributed to length truncation.
How to verify the setup
Acceptance for this feature: ask a question with an original-text basis, check whether the citation array and superscripts can point back to the original text, and check the source identifier and quoteList field of each citation in responseData (non-streaming module results returned with detailed output enabled); then ask a question with no matching materials, and confirm that the array is empty while the pipeline runs through.
Business test: check item by item once according to the handover form, see which record is missing, and check whether the version, connection, and task record are consistent.
- In the node, check whether the selected knowledge base collections and their vector models are consistent, and open the search parameter panel to check the values item by item.
- In the conversation, turn on citation superscripts, compare against the source documents, and record the number of citations and the
quoteMaxTokenbudget; do not compare the two for equality.