What this category's data looks like
This page addresses materials for peer review organizations in the deployment, operations, and application handover stage. Category materials include review invitations, expert review comments, and author revision notes; all three contain fields, dates, and signatures, and each plays a different role when entering deployment status and operation records: review invitations record task initiation and receipts, expert review comments carry review conclusions and signatures, and author revision notes reflect version iteration and confirmation. Material sources are editorial system exports and manual archiving; the update cadence changes with manuscript flow and shift handovers, and field characteristics center on whether names, quantities, dates, and signatures are consistent. On the deployment side, the connection results and operation records of the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database must be handed over together, so that versions, connections, and task records can be checked item by item.
Configuration and implementation checks
This link is handled by the deployment environment's connection configuration (server side), not by the capability execution of a model node, and outputs whether the connection is available (service startup result and connection logs). "Handover-ready deployment status and operation records" are then completed by the deployment handover and subsequent business processing.
| Object | Check | Verification action |
|---|---|---|
| Review invitation | Whether the fields, dates, and signatures correspond to the expert review comments and author revision notes, and whether names and quantities are consistent | Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures in the invitation records one by one, and compare them with the other two materials |
| Expert review comments | Whether the version is in sync, whether signatures or receipts are complete, and whether the dates match the invitation records | Check the comment versions, signatures, and receipts item by item according to the handover form, and mark missing items |
| Author revision notes | Whether the names, quantities, and dates in the revision notes match the review comments and invitation records | Check names, quantities, and dates one by one against the revision notes and review comments |
| Deployment connection records | Whether the connection variables for the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database are consistent with the actual instances | In the deployment environment, check the values of MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL against the database addresses, and review the connection results in the startup logs |
Three common errors
- Symptom: For the same review record, the names, quantities, and dates do not match between the invitation and the comments. Cause: The two materials were entered separately and were not compared item by item according to the handover form.
- Symptom: The expert review comment version is not in sync, and the author revision notes still reference the old conclusion. Cause: After the version update, it was not synced to the handover records.
- Symptom: The review invitation lacks a signature or receipt, and the shift handover cannot confirm that the task has been accepted. Cause: The receipt was not archived, and the signature step was omitted.
How to verify the setup
This feature's acceptance: connect once to the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database item by item, check the connection results in the startup logs, and confirm that MONGODB_URI, REDIS_URL, and PG_URL are consistent with the actual instances.
Business test: check once item by item according to the handover form, and see which record is missing.
- In the deployment environment, check that the connection variable values for the main business database, log database, cache, and vector database are consistent with the database addresses, and review the connection results in the startup logs
- Check the names, quantities, dates, and signatures of the review invitations, expert review comments, and author revision notes item by item according to the handover form, and mark missing items