What Data for This Category Looks Like
Funding source KYC data is primarily sourced from compliance documents submitted by users, including bank transaction statements, salary income certificates, and asset holding certificates. Data updates follow a static pattern: no automatic updates occur after a single submission. A new verification workflow triggers only when a user re-uploads documents. Most documents use a tabular layout, with standard fields such as transaction date, counterparty account, transaction amount, transaction summary, and others. Some cross-border scenarios include content related to foreign currency conversion. Field units are uniformly set to RMB yuan. Some corporate bank statements include a corporate account identification field.
Constraints on Workflow Orchestration
The tabular structure of funding source data requires workflows to prioritize structured document parsing nodes, ensuring accurate and complete field extraction. The static, single-submission data attribute means workflows do not need to retain conversation context, preventing historical interaction content from interfering with current document parsing logic. Fields include format-sensitive content such as amounts and dates, so workflows must include additional format verification nodes to ensure data meets compliance verification format requirements. Multi-page PDF statement documents require workflows to support page-by-page parsing and field merging, avoiding missed cross-page transaction records.
Configuration Settings
| Configuration Item | Recommended Value | Rationale |
|---|---|---|
parse_table_mode | enabled | Funding source data mostly uses a tabular structure. Enabling this mode automatically extracts structured fields and reduces manual sorting workload |
max_context | 0 | Funding source KYC is a single-document verification scenario. No conversation context needs to be retained to avoid interference from irrelevant historical content with current parsing |
required_fields | transaction date, transaction amount, counterparty | Compliance verification requires covering core mandatory fields to ensure extracted data meets regulatory requirements for completeness |
parse_timeout | 300 seconds | Bank statement documents usually have multiple pages. Reserving sufficient parsing time prevents timeout errors |
format_check_switch | enabled | Verifies whether amount and date formats comply with compliance standards, reducing errors in subsequent manual verification |
The parameter values provided on this page are common starting points for configuration. Actual values are affected by material form, data volume and business rules. Specific issues require case-by-case analysis. It is recommended to test on the reader's own samples before finalizing the configuration.
Three Common Misconfigurations
- Phenomenon: Missing fields or incorrect formatting in extracted fields after workflow execution. Cause: The
required_fieldsparameter is not configured, and mandatory verification fields are not specified, leading the parsing node to fail to filter invalid content. - Phenomenon: 504 timeout error returned after workflow triggers. Cause: The
parse_timeoutparameter value is not adjusted. When bank statement documents have multiple pages, parsing time exceeds the default threshold. - Phenomenon: Workflow uses previous round's parsing results during multi-round testing. Cause:
max_contextis incorrectly set to a value greater than 0, causing conversation context to be included in the parsing node and interfering with current document field extraction.
How to Confirm Proper Configuration
- Upload a standard bank statement document, and check if the fields returned by the parsing node include the preset mandatory items.
- Adjust the
parse_timeoutparameter, then upload a multi-page PDF statement document, and confirm that the workflow does not throw timeout errors. - Test single document parsing and multi-round testing scenarios, and confirm that parsing results are not affected by historical conversation content.
- Upload a test document with incorrect formatting, and confirm that the format verification node triggers an intercept prompt.
Question material comes from public community discussions. Configuration values are common starting points and should be measured against your own samples. Verified on 2026-09-14.